Compositional quality of the silage of three cultivars of corn (Zea mays) from the Colombian high tropics

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i2.46412

Keywords:

starch, biomass, forage conservation, digestibility, energy

Abstract

Introduction. The elaboration of high-quality corn-silage is a strategy to improve the efficiency of ruminant feeding systems. Objective. To evaluate the effect of cob proportion and sealing time on the compositional quality of silage of three maize cultivars in the Colombian high tropic, harvested in the reproductive phase of milky-pasty grain. Materials and methods. The experiment was conducted in 2017 in Mosquera, Colombia, with the cultivars Simijaca, Medellín, and Pionner. Experiment 1, four different proportions of cob were generated in the silage. Experiment 2, the biomass was ensiled at 0, 8 or 16 hours of wilted. Dry matter (DM), crude protein (CP), starch, and neutral detergent (NDF) and acid detergent (ADF) fibers were determined. The dynamic of pH decrease was evaluated. The effect of cob proportion and wilting time on the DM, OM, and NDF digestibility was determined only in the Simijaca cultivar. Compositional quality and pH dynamics were analyzed using a completely randomized design with a factorial arrangement, while digestibility was analyzed using a completely randomized design. Results. The Medellín cultivar showed lower cob proportion and starch concentration (11.9 %) (p<0.05) and a higher NDF content (51.7 %) (p<0.05). Greater cob content increased starch concentration, energy, and digestibility (p<0.05), and reduced (p<0.05) the final pH value (3.69). Wilted time increased DM, NDF (p<0.05) and final pH value and rate of pH decline, but did not change DM, OM, and NDF digestibility. Conclusion. Using corn silage with more than 66 % of cob and rapidly sealing the biomass of the Simijaca and Pioneer cultivars improved the fermentation conditions and compositional quality.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adams, R. S. (1994). Regression equations for estimating energy values of various feeds. In V. Ishler (Ed.), From feed to milk: Understanding rumen function (Extension circular No. 422, pp. 14–27). Pennsylvania State University.

Adesogan, A. T. (2010). Corn silage quality in tropical climates. In O. G. Pereira, D. M. da Fonseca, J. A. Obeid, D. do Nascimento (Eds.), Proceedings 5th Symposium on strategic management of pasture (pp. 311–327). Universidade Federal de Viçosa.

Adogla-Bessa, T., Owen, E., & Adesogan, A. T. (1999). Ensiling of whole crop wheat with cellulase-hemicellulase based enzymes: 3. Comparing effects of urea or enzyme treatment on forage composition and stability. Anim. Feed Science and Technology, 82(1–2), 51–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(99)00100-5

AlimenTro. (s.f.). Composición química y valor nutricional [Ficha Técnica]. Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria. http://alimentro.agrosavia.co/Home/Index?ReturnUrl=%2f

Avellaneda Avellaneda, Y., Mancipe Muñoz, E. A., & Vargas Martínez, J. J. (2020). Efecto de la edad de rebrote sobre el desarrollo morfológico y composición química del pasto Kikuyo en el trópico alto colombiano. CES Medicina veterinaria y Zootecnia, 15(2), 23–37. https://doi.org/10.21615/cesmvz.15.2.2

Bal, M. A., Shaver, R. D., Shinners, K. J., Coors, J. G., Lauer, J. G., Straub, R. J., & Koegel, R. G. (2000). Stage of maturity, processing, and hybrid effects on ruminal in situ disappearance of whole-plant corn silage. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 86(1–2), 83–94. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-8401(00)00163-2

Borreani, G., Tabacco, E., Schmidt, R. J., Holmes, B. J., & Muck, R. E. (2018). Silage review: Factors affecting dry matter and quality losses in silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 3952–3979. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13837

Brüning, D., Gerlach, K., Weiß, K., & Südekum, K. -H. (2018). Effect of compaction, delayed sealing and aerobic exposure on maize silage quality and on formation of volatile organic compounds. Grass Forage Science, 73(1), 53–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/gfs.12288

Cañadas, A., Molina, C., Rade, D., & Fernández, F. (2016). Interacción época/densidad de siembra sobre la producción de ocho híbridos de maíz forrajeros, Ecuador. Revista de MVZ de la Universidad de Córdoba, 21(1), 5112–5123. https://doi.org/10.21897/rmvz.22

Carulla, J. E., & Ortega, E. (2016). Sistemas de producción lechera en Colombia: retos y oportunidades. Archivos Latinoamericanos de Producción Animal, 24(2), 83–87.

Castillo, J., Benavides, J., Vargas, J., Avellaneda, Y., & García, G. (2019). Applied research on dairy cattle feeding systems in Colombian high tropics. Revista de Ciencias Agrícolas, 36(2), 108–122. https://doi.org/10.22267/rcia.193602.122

Coors, J. G., Albrecht, K. A., & Bures, E. J. (1996). Ear-fill effects on yield and quality of silage corns. Crop Science, 37(1), 243–247. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183X003700010043x

da Silva, M. S. J., Cabreira Jobim, C., Poppi, E. C., Tres, T. T., & Puntel Osmari, M. (2015). Production technology and quality of corn silage for feeding dairy cattle in Southern Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 44(9), 303–313. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1806-92902015000900001

Dalla Valle, D. E., Andrade, F. H., Viviani, E., & Wade, M. H. (2008). The effect of kernel number on growth, yield and quality of forage maize. Revista Argentina de Producción Animal, 28(2), 87–97.

Díaz Amaris, C., & Rivera Gómez J. A. (1980). ICA V. 402 primera variedad de maíz montaña amarillo para las zonas frías moderadas colombianas [Plegable de divulgación No. 153]. Repositorio de la Corporación Colombiana de Investigación Agropecuaria. https://repository.agrosavia.co/handle/20.500.12324/20526?show=full

Elizondo-Salazar, J. A., & Boschini-Figueroa, C. (2002). Producción de forraje con maíz criollo y maíz híbrido. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 13(1), 13–17. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v13i1.13227

Elizondo-Salazar, J. A. (2017). Producción de biomasa y calidad nutricional de tres forrajes cosechados a dos alturas. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 28(2), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.15517/ma.v28i2.23418

Federación Colombiana de Ganaderos, Fondo Nacional del Ganado, & Servicio Nacional de Aprendizaje. (2013). Costos modales en ganadería de leche Trópico alto de Colombia: Ventana a la competitividad ganadera. DOC PLAYER. https://bit.ly/3McreyR

Ferreira, G., & Brown, A. N. (2016). Environmental factors affecting corn quality for silage. In T. Da Silva, & E. M. Santos (Eds.), Advances in silage production and utilization (pp. 39–51). IntechOpen. https://doi.org/10.5772/64381

Franco Martínez, J. R. P., González Huerta, A., Pérez López, D. J., & González Ronquillo, M. (2015). Caracterización fenotípica de híbridos y cultivares de maíz forrajero en Valles Altos del Estado de México, México. Revista Mexicana de Ciencias Agrícolas, 6(8), 1915–1927.

Gerlach, K., Roß, F. H., Weiß, K., Buscher, W., & Sudekum, K. H. (2013). Changes in maize silage fermentation products during aerobic deterioration and its impact on feed intake by goats. Agricultural and Food Science, 22(1), 168–181. https://doi.org/10.23986/afsci.6739

Hanway, J. J. (1963). How a corn plant develops? Agronomy Journal, 55(5), 487-492. https://doi.org/10.2134/agronj1963.00021962005500050024x

Honig, H. (1990). Evaluation of aerobic stability. In S. Lindgren, & K. Lunden Pattersson (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eurobac stability (pp. 76–82). Sveriges Lantbruksuniv.

Horwitz, W., & Latimer, G. W. (2005). Official methods analysis of AOAC International (18th Ed.). AOAC International.

Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario. (1992). Fertilización en diversos cultivos (5ª aproximación, Manual de Asistencia Técnica No. 25). Editorial Produmedios.

Jiménez, C., Pineda, L., León, B., & Montenegro, A. (2002). Producción de maíz y soya forrajera para ensilaje y venta parcial de la cosecha de elotes o chilotes. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 13(1), 45–48. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v13i1.13245

Johnson, L., Harrison, J. H., Hunt, C., Shinners, K., Doggett, C. G., & Sapienza, D. (1999). Nutritive value of corn silage as affected by maturity and mechanical processing: A contemporary review. Journal of Dairy Science, 82(12), 2813–2825. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(99)75540-2

Khan, N. A., Yu, P., Ali, M., Cone, J. W., & Hendriks, W. H. (2015). Nutritive value of maize silage in relation to dairy cow performance and milk quality. Journal of Science and Food Agriculture, 95(2), 238–252. https://doi.org/10.1002/jsfa.6703

Kim, S. C., & Adesogan, A. T. (2006). Influence of ensiling temperature, simulated rainfall, and delayed sealing on fermentation characteristics and aerobic stability of corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 89(8), 3122–3132. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72586-3

Kung Jr, L., Shaver, R. D., Grant, R. J., & Schmidt, R. J. (2018). Silage review: Interpretation of chemical, microbial, and organoleptic components of silages. Journal of Dairy Science, 101(5), 4020–4033. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2017-13909

Lasmar de Oliveira, I., Miranda Lima, L., Rume Casagrande, D., Stefanelli Lara, M. A., & Fernandes Bernardes, T. (2017). Nutritive value of corn silage from intensive dairy farms in Brazil. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, 46(6), 494–501. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-92902017000600004

Liu, Z., Yang, X., Lin, X., Hubbard, K. G., & Wang, J. (2016). Narrowing the agronomic yield gaps of maize by improved soil, cultivar, and agricultural management practices in different climate zones of Northeast China. Earth Interactions, 20(12), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1175/EI-D-15-0032.1

Makkar, H. P. S. (2016). Smart livestock feeding strategies for harvesting triple gain – the desired outcomes in planet, people and profit dimensions: a developing country perspective. Animal Production Science, 56(3), 519–534. https://doi.org/10.1071/AN15557

Marchesini, G., Serva, L., Garbin, E., Mirisola, M., & Andrighetto, I. (2017). Near-infrared calibration transfer for undried whole maize plant between laboratory and onsite spectrometers. Italian Journal of Animal Science, 17(1), 66–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/1828051X.2017.1345660

Millner, J. P., Villaver, R., & Hardacre, A. K. (2005). The yield and nutritive value of maize hybrids growth for silage. New Zeland Journal of Agricultural Research, 48, 101–108. https://doi.org/10.1080/00288233.2005.9513637

Mills, J. A., & Kung, L. (2002). The effect of delayed ensiling and application of a propionic acid-based additive on the fermentation of barley silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 85(8), 1969–1975. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(02)74273-2

Moreno Mendoza, J. D., & Torregroza Castro, M. A. (1984). ICA V 508 variedad mejorada de maíz tipo sogamoseño para clima frío [Brochure]. Instituto Colombiano Agropecuario.

Mueller, S. M., Messina, C. D., & Vyn, T. J. (2019). Simultaneous gains in grain yield and nitrogen efficiency over 70 years of maize genetic improvement. Scientific Reports, 9(1), Article 9095. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-45485-5

Mussadiq, Z., Hetta, M., Swensson, C., & Gustavsson, A. (2012). Plant development, agronomic performance and nutritive value of forage maize depending on hybrid and marginal site conditions at high latitudes. Acta Agriculturae Scandinavica Section B – Soil and Plant Science, 62(5), 420–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/09064710.2011.639795

Nagaraja, T. G., & Titgemeyer, E. (2007). Ruminal acidosis in beef cattle: The current microbiological and nutritional outlook. Journal of Dairy Science, 90(Suppl. 1), E17–38. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2006-478

Nutcher, K., Salacci, R., Kuber, C. P., Kuber, R., Uriarte, M. E., & Bolsen, K. K. (2015, July 1-3). Effects of sealing time post-filling and sealing material on fermentation, nutritional quality, and organic matter loss of whole-plant maize ensiled in a drive-over pile [Conference presentation]. Seventeenth International Silage Conference, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil. http://static.atkft.hu/Dokumentumok/Proceedings2015.pdf

Pahlow, G., Muck, R. E., Driehuis, F., Oude, E, S., & Spoelstra, S.F. (2003). Microbiology of ensiling. In L. Al.-Amoodi, K. A. Barbarick, J. J. Volenec, W. A. Dick, D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, & J. H. Harrison (Eds.), Silage science and technology (pp. 31-93). American Society of Agronomy Inc., Crop Science Society of America Inc., & Soil Science Society of America Inc. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134/agronmonogr42

Peyrat, J., Baumont, R., Le Morvan, A., & Nozière, P. (2016). Effect of maturity and hybrid on ruminal and intestinal digestion of corn silage in dry cows. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(1), 258–268. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-9466

Rao, I., Peters, M., Castro, A., Schultze-Kraft, R., White, D., Fisher, M., Miles, J., Lascano, C., Blümmel, M., Bungestab, D., Tapasco, J., Hyman, G., Bolliger, A., Paul, D., Van der Hoek, R., Maass, B., Tiemann, T., Cuchillo, M., Douxchamps, S., … Rudel, T. (2015). LivestockPlus - The sustainable intensification of forage-based agricultural systems to improve livelihoods and ecosystems services in the tropics. Tropical Grasslands, 3(2), 59–82. https://doi.org/10.17138/TGFT(3)59-82

Ruiz, O., Beltrán, R., Salvador, F., Rubio, H., Grado, A., & Castillo, Y. (2006). Valor nutritivo y rendimiento forrajero de híbridos de maíz para ensilaje. Revista Cubana de Ciencia Agrícola, 40(1), 91-96.

Sánchez, L., Londoño, C. E., Benavides, J. C., Castillo, J., & Torres, D. R. (2013). Recuperación de suelos y renovación de praderas en sistemas de producción de leche especializada del trópico alto. Produmedios.

Sejrsen, K., Hvelpund, T., & Nielsen, M. O. (Eds.). (2006). Ruminant physiology: Digestion and passage of fibre in ruminants. Wageningen Press.

Statistical Analysis Systems. (2016). User’s guide Version 9.4. SAS Institute Inc.

Tabbacco, E., Righi, F., Quarantelli, A., & Borreani, G. (2011). Dry matter and nutritional losses during aerobic deterioration of corn and sorghum silages as influenced by different lactic acid bacteria inocula. Journal of Dairy Science, 94(3), 1409-1419. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2010-3538

Van Soest, P. J., & Robertson, J. B. (1980). Systems of analysis for evaluating fibrous feeds. In W. J. Pigden, C. C. Balch, & M. Graham (Eds.), Standardization of analytical methodology in feeds (pp. 49–60). International Development Research Centre.

Vargas Martínez, J. J., Sierra Alarcón, A. M., Mancipe Muñoz, E. A., & Avellaneda Avellaneda, Y. (2018). El Kikuyo, una gramínea presente en los sistemas de rumiantes en trópico alto colombiano. Revista CES Medicina Veterinaria y Zootecnia, 13(2), 137–156. https://doi.org/10.21615/4558

Villa, A. F., Meléndez, A. P., Carulla, J. E., Pabón, M. L., & Cárdenas, E. A. (2010). Estudio microbiológico y calidad nutricional del ensilaje de maíz en dos ecorregiones de Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Ciencias Pecuarias, 23(1), 65–77.

Weiß, K., Kroschewski, B., & Auerbach, H. (2020). Formation of volatile organic compounds during the fermentation of maize as affected by sealing time and silage additive use. Archives of Animal Nutrition, 74(2), 150–163. https://doi.org/10.1080/1745039X.2019.1694357

Weiss, K., Kroschewski, B., & Auerbach, H. (2016). Effects of air exposure, temperature and additives on fermentation characteristics, yeast count, aerobic stability and volatile organic compounds in corn silage. Journal of Dairy Science, 99(10), 8053–8069. https://doi.org/10.3168/jds.2015-10323

Wilkinson, J. M., Bolsen, K. K., & Lin, C. J. (2003). History of silage. In L. Al.-Amoodi, K. A. Barbarick, J. J. Volenec, W. A. Dick, D. R. Buxton, R. E. Muck, & J. H. Harrison (Eds.), Silage science and technology (pp. 1–30). American Society of Agronomy Inc., Crop Science Society of America Inc., & Soil Science Society of America Inc. https://acsess.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.2134/agronmonogr42

Published

2022-04-26

How to Cite

Mancipe-Muñoz, E. A., Castillo-Sierra, J., Vargas-Martínez, J. de J., & Avellaneda-Avellaneda, Y. (2022). Compositional quality of the silage of three cultivars of corn (Zea mays) from the Colombian high tropics. Agronomía Mesoamericana, 33(2), 46412. https://doi.org/10.15517/am.v33i2.46412

Most read articles by the same author(s)