Resumen
Introducción: A pesar de que el enriquecimiento sensorial es fundamental para garantizar el bienestar de los animales silvestres en cautiverio, los olores no son incluidos de forma rutinaria en los protocolos de enriquecimiento para aves. Además, en el caso de estos animales, la neofobia puede ser un problema a la hora de implementar nuevos dispositivos de enriquecimiento. Objetivo: Explorar cómo varía la participación y la latencia en la interacción con un enriquecimiento olfativo entre grupos taxonómicos de aves (Amazona spp. / Ara spp. / Ramphastos spp.). Métodos: Expusimos a 257 aves a un enriquecimiento olfativo y registramos qué individuos participaron y el tiempo que tardaron en interactuar con él. Resultados: La participación en el enriquecimiento fue mayor en los tucanes en comparación con las amazonas y los guacamayos. Además, el tiempo de latencia para interactuar con el enriquecimiento fue mayor en las amazonas que en las otras especies. Nuestros hallazgos sugieren que los tucanes son especies neofílicas que podrían beneficiarse de tasas de exploración más altas. Por otro lado, las amazonas parecen ser particularmente neofóbicas, posiblemente debido a sus hábitos alimenticios menos oportunistas en comparación con los tucanes y a su mayor vulnerabilidad a la depredación en comparación con los guacamayos. Conclusión: Estos resultados señalan que los tucanes serían más proclives a participar en enriquecimientos ambientales, mientras que un diseño que utilice olores dentro de objetos más naturales o familiares podría ser más exitoso para las psitácidas.
Citas
Benavidez, A., Palacio, F. X., Rivera, L. O., Echevarria, A. L., & Politi, N. (2018). Diet of Neotropical parrots is independent of phylogeny but correlates with body size and geographical range. Ibis, 160(4), 742–754.
Berg, K. S., Socola, J., & Angel, R. R. (2007). Great Green Macaws and the annual cycle of their food plants in Ecuador. Journal of Field Ornithology, 78(1), 1–10.
Biondi, L. M., Bó, M. S., & Vassallo, A. I. (2010). Inter-individual and age differences in exploration, neophobia and problem–solving ability in a Neotropical raptor (Milvago chimango). Animal Cognition, 13(5), 701–710.
Bor-Mikich, S., Jennings, J., & Cubas, Z. S. (2008). Order Piciformes (Toucans, Woodpeckers). In M. Fowler, & Z. S. Cubas (Eds.), Biology, medicine, and surgery of South American wild animals (pp. 180–199). John Wiley Sons.
Brilot, B. O., Asher, L., Feenders, G., & Bateson, M. (2009). Quantification of abnormal repetitive behaviour in captive European starlings (Sturnus vulgaris). Behavioural Processes, 82(3), 256–264.
Brown, G. E., Ferrari, M. C., Elvidge, C. K., Ramnarine, I., & Chivers, D. P. (2013). Phenotypically plastic neophobia: a response to variable predation risk. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 280(1756), 20122712.
Clark, F., & King, A. J. (2008). A critical review of zoo–based olfactory enrichment. Chemical Signals in Vertebrates, 11, 391–398.
Colton, S., & Fraley G. S. (2014) The effects of environmental enrichment devices on feather picking in commercially housed Pekin ducks. Poultry Science, 93(9), 2143–2150.
Cove, M. V., Fernandez, C. M., Alvarez, M. V., Bird, S., Jones, D. W., & Fagan, M. E. (2017). Toucans descend to the forest floor to consume the eggs of ground-nesting birds. Food Webs, 10, 2–4.
Crane, A. L., & Ferrari, M. C. (2017). Patterns of predator neophobia: a meta-analytic review. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 284(1861), 20170583.
Davlantes, J., & Howe, H. F. (2018). Keel-billed Toucans (Ramphastos sulfuratus) on the ground in a tropical forest restoration experiment. The Wilson Journal of Ornithology, 130(3), 770–773.
de Haas, E. N., & van der Eijk, J. A. (2018). Where in the serotonergic system does it go wrong? Unravelling the route by which the serotonergic system affects feather pecking in chickens. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 95, 170–188.
Ensminger, A. L., & Westneat, D. F. (2012). Individual and sex differences in habituation and neophobia in House Sparrows (Passer domesticus). Ethology, 118(11), 1085–1095.
Fraixedas, S., Fernández–Llamazares, Á., Rico, A., Bach, A., Borrós, M., Barriocanal, C., & Boada, M. (2014). Suitability of the South Caribbean Coast of Costa Rica for reintroduction of the great green macaw Ara ambiguous. Natural Resources, 5, 653–665.
Fox, R. A., & Millam, J. R. (2004). The effect of early environment on neophobia in orange–winged Amazon parrots (Amazona amazonica). Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 89(1–2), 117–129.
Greenberg, R. S. (1990). Ecological plasticity, neophobia, and resource use in birds. Studies in Avian Biology, 13, 431–437.
Greenberg, R. (2003). The role of neophobia and neophilia in the development of innovative behaviour of birds. In S. M. Reader, & K. N. Laland (Eds.), Animal innovation (pp. 175–196). Oxford University Press.
Greenberg, R., & Mettke–Hofmann, C. (2001). Ecological aspects of neophobia and neophilia in birds. In V. Nolan, & C. F. Thompson (Eds.), Current ornithology (pp. 119–178). Springer.
Herborn, K. A., Macleod, R., Miles, W. T., Schofield, A. N., Alexander, L., & Arnold, K. E. (2010). Personality in captivity reflects personality in the wild. Animal Behaviour, 79(4), 835–843.
Hernández, M. C., Villada, A. M., & Barja, I. (2022). Onto the sense of smell in macaws, amazons and toucans: can they use volatile cues of fruits to make foraging decisions? Integrative Zoology, 18(4), 762–771.
IBM Corp. (2015). IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows (Version 23.0, Software). IBM Corp, Armonk, United States of America. https://www.ibm.com/products/spss-statistics
Jenkins, J. R. (2001). Feather picking and self–mutilation in psittacine birds. Veterinary Clinics of North America: Exotic Animal Practice, 4(3), 651–667.
Kalmar, I. D., Janssens, G. P., & Moons, C. P. (2010). Guidelines and ethical considerations for housing and management of psittacine birds used in research. ILAR Journal, 51(4), 409–423.
Kalmar, I. D., Moons, C. P., Meers, L. L., & Janssens, G. P. (2007). Psittacine birds as laboratory animals: refinements and assessment of welfare. Journal of the American Association for Laboratory Animal Science, 46(4), 8-15.
Krasheninnikova, A., Berardi, R., Lind, M. A., O’Neill, L., & von Bayern, A. M. (2019). Primate cognition test battery in parrots. Behaviour, 156(5–8), 721–761.
Ley No. 7451. Ley del bienestar de los animales. (1994). Asamblea Legislativa de la República de Costa Rica. http://www.pgrweb.go.cr/scij/Busqueda/Normativa/Normas/nrm_texto_completo.aspx?param1=NRTC&nValor1=1&nValor2=84296&nValor3=108689&strTipM=TC
Lumeij, J. T., & Hommers, C. J. (2008). Foraging ‘enrichment’ as treatment for pterotillomania. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 111(1–2), 85–94.
Medina-García, A., Jawor, J. M., & Wright, T. F. (2017). Cognition, personality, and stress in budgerigars, Melopsittacus undulatus. Behavioral Ecology, 28(6), 1504–1516.
Mellor, E., Brilot, B., & Collins, S. (2018). Abnormal repetitive behaviours in captive birds: A Tinbergian review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 198, 109–120.
Mellor, E. L., McDonald-Kinkaid, H. K., Mendl, M. T., Cuthill, I. C., van Zeeland, Y. R., & Mason, G. J. (2021). Nature calls: intelligence and natural foraging style predict poor welfare in captive parrots. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 288(1960), 20211952.
Mettke‐Hofmann, C., Winkler, H., & Leisler, B. (2002). The significance of ecological factors for exploration and neophobia in parrots. Ethology, 108(3), 249–272.
Newberry, R. C. (1995). Environmental enrichment: Increasing the biological relevance of captive environments. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 44(2–4), 229–243.
Nielsen, B. L., Jezierski, T., Bolhuis, J. E., Amo, L., Rosell, F., Oostindjer, M., Christensen, J. W., McKeegan, D., Wells, D. L., & Hepper, P. (2015). Olfaction: an overlooked sensory modality in applied ethology and animal welfare. Frontiers in Veterinary Science, 2, 69.
O’Brien, J. (2006). Effects of conspecific playback recordings on a pair of Toco Toucans. Shape of Enrichment, 15(3), 3–5.
Real Decreto 53/2013. (2013). Boletín Oficial del Estado Español, 34, 11370–11421.
Remsen Jr, J. V., Hyde, M. A., & Chapman, A. (1993). The diets of Neotropical trogons, motmots, barbets and toucans. The Condor, 95(1), 178–192.
Rodriguez–Lopez, R. (2016). Environmental enrichment for parrot species: Are we squawking up the wrong tree? Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 180, 1–10.
Romero, A., Cedeño, A. S., Montaño, J., & Layola, G. O. (2022). More than Froot Loops: Keel-billed toucans (Ramphastos sulfuratus) consume vertebrate carrion. Food Webs, 31, e00223.
Samson, J. (1996). Behavioral problems of farmed ostriches in Canada. The Canadian Veterinary Journal, 37(7), 412.
Schruhl, D., Beus, T., Abel, T. D., Medler, M. J., Arce, A., & Mork, K. (2012). Macaw Cam: Exploratory camera trap techniques for monitoring and conservation of Scarlet Macaw (Ara macao) Nests. Huxley Spatial Institute.
Seibert, L. M. (2006). Social behaviour of psittacine birds. In A. U. Luescher (Ed.), Manual of Parrot Behavior (pp. 43–48). Blackwell Publishing.
van Hoek, C. S., & Ten-Cate, C. (1998). Abnormal behavior in caged birds kept as pets. Journal of Applied Animal Welfare Science, 1(1), 51–64.
Van Horik, J. O. (2014). Comparative cognition and behavioural flexibility in two species of neotropical parrots (Doctoral dissertation). Queen Mary University of London, United Kingdom.
van Zeeland, Y. R., Spruit, B. M., Rodenburg, T. B., Riedstra, B., van Hierden, Y. M., Buitenhuis, B., & Lumeij, J. T. (2009). Feather damaging behaviour in parrots: A review with consideration of comparative aspects. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 121(2), 75–95.
Vaughan, C., Nemeth, N., & Marineros, L. (2006). Scarlet Macaw, Ara macao, (Psittaciformes: Psittacidae) diet in Central Pacific Costa Rica. Revista de Biología Tropical, 54(3), 919–926.
Volpe, N. L., Thalinger, B., Vilacoba, E., Braukmann, T. W., Di Giacomo, A. S., Berkunsky, I., & Kopuchian, C. (2022). Diet composition of reintroduced Red-and-Green Macaws reflects gradual adaptation to life in the wild. The Condor, 124(1), duab059.
Wells, D. L. (2009). Sensory stimulation as environmental enrichment for captive animals: A review. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, 118(1–2), 1–11.
Wilson, L., & Luescher, A. U. (2006). Parrots and fear. In A. U. Luescher (Ed.), Manual of parrot behavior (pp. 225–231). Blackwell Publishing.
Young, R. J. (2013). Environmental enrichment for captive animals. John Wiley & Sons.
Zúñiga-Ortiz, A. (2014). Primer reporte de depredación de Ramphastos ambiguus (Rhamphastidae) sobre ratones en el Parque Nacional Braulio Carrillo, Costa Rica. Zeledonia, 18(2), 67–69.
Comentarios
Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Derechos de autor 2024 Revista de Biología Tropical