Phenotypic characterization of common bean germplasm for resistance to terminal drought
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.15517/ma.v29i1.27618Keywords:
biomass partitioning, geometric mean, harvest index, Phaseolus vulgaris L.Abstract
Terminal drought is a worldwide constraint to common bean production and its negative effects will be increased by climate change. The objective of this research was to characterize phenotypically advanced lines and commercial cultivars of common bean for their resistance to terminal drought stress. Field trials were conducted during 2012 and 2013 at Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira, Colombia. A 4x4 partially balanced lattice design with four replicates was used and, evaluated under irrigation and terminal drought. To achieve the terminal drought condition, irrigation was suspended at 22-23 days after planting. Terminal drought reduced mean grain yield by 68%. Lines SEN 56, BFS 29, NCB 226 and SER 16 showed high grain yield in both irrigated (3617-3836 kg/ ha) and terminal drought (1232-1447 kg/ha) conditions, while RCB 593 and G 40001 showed high grain yield in drought (>1270 kg/ha) and similar to checks in irrigated condition. The most resistant lines showed lower drought susceptibility index (0,88 - 1,00), earlier maturity (56 - 60 dds), superior geometric mean (1931 - 2311 kg/ha), and higher number of grains/m2, (673 - 1250). Drought resistant lines produced at least 15% and 50% more grain yield than EAP 9510-77, commercial check for Central America, in irrigated and drought condition, respectively. In addition, they were also superior to other commercial checks such as DOR 390 and Bribri.
Downloads
References
Assefa, T., S.E. Beebe, I.M. Rao, J.B. Cuasquer, M.C. Duque, M. Rivera, A. Battisti, and M. Lucchin. 2013. Pod harvest index as a selection criterion to improve drought resistance in white pea bean. Field Crops Res. 148:24-33. doi:10.1016/j.
fcr.2013.04.008
Bartlett, M.S. 1947. The use of transformations. Biometrics 3:39-52.
Beebe, S.E. 2012. Common bean breeding in the tropics. Plant Breed. Rev. 36:357-426. doi:10.1002/9781118358566.ch5
Beebe, S.E., I.M. Rao, M.W. Blair, and J.A. Acosta. 2013. Phenotyping common beans for adaptation to drought. Front. Physiol. 4:35. doi:10.3389/fphys.2013.00035
Beebe, S., I. Rao, M.W. Blair, and L. Butare. 2009. Breeding for abiotic stress tolerance in common bean: present and future challenges. Paper presented at: 14th Australian Plant Breeding and 11th Society for Advancement of Breeding Research in Asia and Oceania (SABRAO), Brisbane, AUS. 10-14 Aug.
Beebe, S.E., I.M. Rao, C. Cajiao, and M. Grajales. 2008. Selection for drought resistance in common bean also improves yield in phosphorus limited and favorable environments. Crop Sci. 48:582-592. doi:10.2135/cropsci2007.07.0404
Beebe, S.E., I.M. Rao, M.J. Devi, and J. Polanía. 2014. Common beans, biodiversity, and multiple stresses: Challenges of drought resistance in tropical soils. Crop Pasture Sci. 65:667-675. doi:10.1071/CP13303
Beebe, S., J. Ramírez, A. Jarvis, I.M. Rao, G. Mosquera, J.M. Bueno, and M.W. Blair. 2011. Genetic improvement of common beans and the challenges of climate change. In: S.S. Yadav et al., editors, Crop adaptation to climate change. Wiley-Blackwell, Oxford, GBR. p. 356-369.
Blair, M.W., W. Pantoja, and L.C. Carmenza-Muñoz. 2012. First use of microsatellite markers in a large collection of cultivated and wild accessions of tepary bean (Phaseolus acutifolius A. Gray). Theor. Appl. Genet. 125:1137-1147. doi: 10.1007/s00122-012-1900-0
Broughton, W.J., G. Hernández, M. Blair, S. Beebe, P. Gepts, and J. Vanderleyden. 2003. Beans (Phaseolus spp.) – model food legumes. Plant Soil 252:55-128. doi: 10.1023/A:1024146710611
Castellanos, J.Z., J.J. Peña-Cabriales, and J.A. Acosta-Gallegos. 1996. 15N-determined dinitrogen fixation capacity of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) cultivars under water stress. J. Agr. Sci. 126:327-333. doi:10.1017/S0021859600074888
Cuéllar, M.E., y F.J. Morales. 2006. La mosca blanca Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius) como plaga y vectora de virus en fríjol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Rev. Colomb. Entomol. 32(1):1-9.
dos-Santos, M.G., R.V. Ribeiro, R.F. de-Oliveira, and C. Pimentel. 2004. Gas exchange and yield response to foliar phosphorus application in Phaseolus vulgaris L. under drought. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 16:171-179. doi:10.1590/S1677-04202004000300007
Fernández, W., y P. Ramírez. 1991. El Niño, la Oscilación del Sur y sus efectos en Costa Rica: una revisión. Tecnol. Marcha 11(1):3-10.
Fischer, R.A., and R. Maurer. 1978. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. I. Grain yield responses. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 29:897-912. doi:10.1071/AR9780897
Foster, E.F., A. Pajarito, and J. Acosta-Gallegos. 1995. Moisture stress impact on N partitioning, N remobilization and N use efficiency in beans (Phaseolus vulgaris). J. Agr. Sci. 124:27-37. doi:10.1017/S0021859600071215
Frahm, M.A., J.C. Rosas, N. Mayek-Pérez, E. López-Salinas, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, and J.D. Kelly. 2004. Breeding beans for resistance to terminal drought in the lowland tropics. Euphytica 136:223-232. doi:10.1023/B:EUPH.0000030678.12073.a9
Freytag, G.F., and D.G. Debouck. 2002. Taxonomy, distribution and ecology of the genus Phaseolus (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae) in North America, Mexico and Central America. Sida Botanical Miscellany, TX, USA.
Gálvez, G.E., y F.J. Morales. 1994. Virus transmitidos por la mosca blanca. En: M. Pastor-Corrales, y H.F. Schwartz, editores, Problemas de producción de frijol en los trópicos. 2da ed. CIAT, Cali, COL. p. 435-472.
Graham, P.H., and P. Rinalli. 1997. Common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Field Crops Res. 53:131-146. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(97)00112-3
Hernández, J.C., R. Araya, y A. Morales. 2001. Bribrí, nueva variedad de frijol rojo pequeño para Costa Rica. Agron. Mesoam. 12(1):15-23.
Hernández, J.C., y F.I. Elizondo. 2006. Estudio sobre la adopción de variedades mejoradas de frijol en las principales zonas productoras de frijol de la región Brunca de Costa Rica. Agron. Mesoam. 17:357-367. doi:10.15517/am.v17i3.5171
Klaedtke, S.M., C. Cajiao, M. Grajales, J. Polanía, G. Borrero, A. Guerrero, M. Rivera, I. Rao, S.E. Beebe, and J. Léon. 2012. Photosynthate remobilization capacity from drought-adapted common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) lines can improve yield potential of interspecific populations within the secondary gene pool. J. Plant Breed. Crop Sci. 4(4):49-61. doi:10.5897/JPBCS11.087
McClean, P.E., J. Burridge, S. Beebe, I.M. Rao, and T.G. Porch. 2011. Crop improvement in the era of climate change: an integrated, multi-disciplinary approach for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris). Funct. Plant Biol. 38:927-933. doi: 10.1071/FP11102.
Micheletto, S., L. Rodríguez-Uribe, R. Hernández, R.D. Richins, J. Curry, and M.A. O’Connell. 2007. Comparative transcript profiling in roots of Phaseolus acutifolius and P. vulgaris under water deficit stress. Plant Sci. 173:510-520. doi:10.1016/j.plantsci.2007.08.003
Muñoz, L.C., M.W. Blair, M.C. Duque, W. J. Thome, and W. Roca. 2004. Introgression in common bean x tepary bean interspecific congruity-backcross lines as measured by AFLP markers. Crop Sci. 44:637-645. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.0637
Muñoz, L.C., MC. Duque, D.G. Debouck, and M.W. Blair. 2006. Taxonomy of tepary bean and wild relatives as determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers. Crop Sci. 46:1744-1754. doi:10.2135/cropsci2005-12-1754
Muñoz-Perea, C.G., R.G. Allen, D.T. Westermann, J.L. Wright, and S.P. Singh. 2007. Water use efficiency among dry bean landraces and cultivars in drought-stressed and non-stressed environments. Euphytica 155:393-402. doi:10.1007/s10681-006-9340-z
Muñoz-Perea, C.G., H. Terán, R.G. Allen, J.L. Wright, D.T. Westermann, and S.P. Singh. 2006. Selection for drought resistance in dry bean landraces and cultivars. Crop Sci. 46:2111-2120. doi:10.2135/cropsci2006.01.0029
Nuñez-Barrios, A., G. Hoogenboom, and D.S. Nesmith. 2005. Drought stress and the distribution of vegetative and reproductive traits of a bean cultivar. Sci. Agric. (Braz.) 62:18-22. doi:10.1590/S0103-90162005000100004
Omae, H., A. Kumar, and M. Shono. 2012. Adaptation to high temperature and water deficit in the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) during the reproductive period. J. Bot. 2012: Article ID 803413 doi:10.1155/2012/803413
Passioura, J.B. 2002. Soil conditions and plant growth. Plant Cell Environ. 25:311-318. doi: 10.1046/j.0016-8025.2001.00802.x
Polanía, J.A., I.M. Rao, S. Beebe, y R. García. 2009. Desarrollo y distribución de raíces bajo estrés por sequía en frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) en un sistema de tubos con suelo. Agron. Colomb. 27:25-32.
Polanía, J., I.M. Rao, C. Cajiao, M. Rivera, B. Raatz, and S. Beebe. 2016. Physiological traits associated with drought resistance in Andean and Mesoamerican genotypes of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.). Euphytica 210:17-29. doi: 10.1007/s10681-016-1691-5
Polanía, J.A., I.M. Rao, S. Mejía, S.E. Beebe, y C. Cajiao. 2012. Características morfo-fisiológicas de frijol común (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) relacionadas con la adaptación a sequía. Acta Agron. 61:197-206.
Porch, T.G., J.S. Beaver, D.G. Debouck, S.A. Jackson, J.D. Kelly, and H. Dempewolf. 2013. Use of wild relatives and closely related species to adapt common bean to climate change. Agronomy 3:433-461. doi:10.3390/agronomy3020433
Porch, T.G., V.H. Ramírez, D. Santana, and E.W. Harmsen. 2009. Evaluation of common bean for drought tolerance in Juana Diaz, Puerto Rico. J. Agron. Crop Sci. 195:328-334. doi:10.1111/j.1439-037X.2009.00375.x.
Ramírez-Vallejo, P., and J.D. Kelly. 1998. Traits related to drought resistance in common bean. Euphytica 99:127-136. doi:10.1023/A:1018353200015
Rao, I., S. Beebe, J. Polanía, J. Ricaurte, C. Cajiao, R. García, and M. Rivera. 2013. Can tepary bean be a model for improvement of drought resistance in common bean? Afr. Crop Sci. J. 21:265-281.
Rogers, J.C. 1988. Precipitation variability over the Caribbean and tropical Americas associated with the Southern Oscillation. J. Climate 1:172-182.
Rosales-Serna, R., J. Kohashi-Shibata, J.A. Acosta-Gallegos, C. Trejo-López, J. Ortiz-Cereceres, and J.D. Kelly. 2004. Biomass distribution, maturity acceleration and yield in drought-stressed common bean cultivars. Field Crops Res. 85:203-211. doi:10.1016/S0378-4290(03)00161-8
Rosas, J.C., J.S. Beaver, S. Beebe, y A. Viana. 2004a. Nomenclatura de variedades de frijol común liberadas en Centro América y El Caribe. Agron. Mesoam. 15:221-224. doi:10.15517/am.v15i2.11917
Rosas, J.C., J.S. Beaver, D. Escoto, C.A. Pérez, A. Llano, J.C. Hernández, and R. Araya. 2004b. Registration of ‘Amadeus 77’ small red common bean. Crop Sci. 44:1867-1868. doi:10.2135/cropsci2004.1867
Rosas, J.C., J.C. Hernández, and R. Araya. 2003. Registration of ‘Bribri’ small red bean (race Mesoamerica). Crop Sci. 43:430-431. doi:10.2135/cropsci2003.430a
Singh, S.P. 1995. Selection for water-stress tolerance in interracial populations of common bean. Crop Sci. 35:118-124. doi:10.2135/cropsci1995.0011183X003500010022x
Singh, S.P., P. Gepts, and D.G. Debouck. 1991. Races of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris, Fabaceae). Econ. Bot. 45:379-396. doi:10.1007/BF02887079
Terán, H., and S.P. Singh. 2002a. Comparison of sources and lines selected for drought resistance in common bean. Crop Sci. 42:64-70. doi:10.2135/cropsci2002.0064
Terán, H., and S.P. Singh. 2002b. Selection for drought resistance in early generations of common bean populations. Can. J. Plant Sci. 82:491-497. doi:10.4141/P01-134
Voysest, O. 2000. Mejoramiento genético del frijol (Phaseolus vulgaris L.): legado de variedades de América Latina. CIAT, Cali, COL.
White, J.W, and S.P. Singh. 1991a. Breeding for adaptation to drought. In: A. Van Schoonhoven, and O. Voysest, editors, Common beans. Research for crop improvement. CIAT, Cali, COL, and CAB International, Wallingford, GBR. p. 501-560.
White, J.W, and S.P. Singh. 1991b. Sources and inheritance of earliness in tropically adapted indeterminated common bean. Euphytica 55:15-19. doi:10.1007/BF00022554
Wortmann, C.S., R.A. Kirkby, C.A. Eledu, and D.J. Allan. 1998. Atlas of common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) production in Africa. CIAT, Cali, COL.
Additional Files
- Figura 1. Precipitación y cantidad de agua suministrada mediante riego a dicieséis genotipos de frijol evaluados bajo riego (R) y sequía terminal (ST). Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira, Colombia. 2012-2013. (Español (España))
- Figura 2. Humedad gravimétrica del suelo a una profundidad de 0-10 cm, 10-20 cm, 20-40 cm y 40-60 cm en las parcelas experimentales donde se evaluaron dieciséis genotipos de frijol bajo riego (R) y sequía terminal (ST) durante el 2012 y 2013. Centro Int (Español (España))
- Figura 3. Comparación de germoplasma de frijol de acuerdo con su media combinada de rendimiento en riego y bajo sequía terminal para los años 2012 y 2013. Centro Internacional de Agricultura Tropical (CIAT), Palmira, Colombia. (Español (España))
- Carta a editores de Agronomía Mesoamericana (Español (España))
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
1. Proposed policy for open access journals
Authors who publish in this journal accept the following conditions:
a. Authors retain the copyright and assign to the journal the right to the first publication, with the work registered under the attribution, non-commercial and no-derivative license from Creative Commons, which allows third parties to use what has been published as long as they mention the authorship of the work and upon first publication in this journal, the work may not be used for commercial purposes and the publications may not be used to remix, transform or create another work.
b. Authors may enter into additional independent contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the version of the article published in this journal (e.g., including it in an institutional repository or publishing it in a book) provided that they clearly indicate that the work was first published in this journal.
c. Authors are permitted and encouraged to publish their work on the Internet (e.g. on institutional or personal pages) before and during the review and publication process, as it may lead to productive exchanges and faster and wider dissemination of published work (see The Effect of Open Access).
