Wimb Lu ISSN Impreso: 1659-2107 ISSN electrónico: 2215-6712

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/wimblu/oai
Contrast between the learning theories applied in the current classroom: A look towards the hybridization of its specific characteristics
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
HTML (Español) (Español (España))

Keywords

Learning
teachers
hybridization
eclectic processes
theory
Aprendizaje
docentes
hibridación
procesos eclécticos
teoría

How to Cite

Rojas Londoño, D., Velasquez, C., & Dillon Pérez, F. X. (2023). Contrast between the learning theories applied in the current classroom: A look towards the hybridization of its specific characteristics. Wimb Lu, 18(2), 119–142. https://doi.org/10.15517/wl.v18i2.58721

Abstract

The objective of this research was to analyze whether the teaching practices applied in the classroom are replicated in the teaching days and, if these, generate significant learning as a result. To this end, a qualitative-quantitative study of a descriptive and interpretive type was carried out with a phenomenological approach in a study sample of twenty teachers. As an instrument for collecting information, a structured observation sheet was designed that had the indicators that made it possible to identify which learning theories were most frequently used by teachers and whether these influenced the learning results of their students. One of the main conclusions of this research process focused on determining that teachers use many learning theories in their educational praxis in order to maintain discipline, or in order to create rote and standardized learning processes; Furthermore, in the use of these practices, teachers hope that the student becomes a reflective entity and tries to achieve their own learning, although these are not evaluated in a way that their consolidation can be evidenced.

https://doi.org/10.15517/wl.v18i2.58721
PDF (Español) (Español (España))
HTML (Español) (Español (España))

References

Aguilar, N. «Manual introductorio al análisis de redes sociales.» Revista Redes 19, nº 1 (2005): 16-43.

Alvarez de Zayas, Carlos. La escuela en la vida. Ciudad de Playa: Editorial Pueblo y Educación, 1999.

Araya, V., M. Alfaro, y M. Andonegui. «Constructivismo: Orígenes y Perspectivas.» Universidad Pedagógica Experimental Libertado 13, nº 24 (2007): 76-92.

Ardila, R. «Los orígenes del conductismo, Watson y el manifiesto conductista de 1913.» Revista Latinoamericana de Psicología 45, nº 2 (2013): 315–319.

Asamblea Nacional. Ley Orgánica de Educación Intercultural. 2023. www.educacion.gob.ec (último acceso: 21 de 07 de 2023).

Ausubel, D., J. Novak, y H. Hanesian. Psicología educativa: un punto de vista cognoscitivo (Vol. 3). México: Trillas. Vol. 3. México: Trillas, 1976.

Cestero, E. Data Science y Redes Complejas - Métodos y Aplicaciones. Madrid: Editorial Universitaria Ramon Areces, 2018.

De la Cruz Tomé, M. «Necesidad y objetivos de la formación pedagógica. Revista de educación.» 331 (2003): 35-66.

Downes, S. Connectivism and Connective. Knowledge: Essays on meaning and learning networks. Editorial Trillas, 2009.

Fulton, D. Ways of Learning - Learning Theories for the classroom. 4. New York: Taylor & Francis, 2018.

Green, C. «Psychology as the Behaviorist Views it.» Psychological Review, 20, 158-177, 2016: 158-177.

Guney, A., y S. Al. «Effective learning environments in relation to different learning theories.» Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 (2012): 2334-2338.

Hernández, R. Metodología de la Investigación. México D.F.: Interamericana , 2010.

Honey-Alonso, y D. Gallego. «Cuestionario Honey-Alonso de estilos de aprendizaje.» 2000.

Jonassen, D. Designing Constructivist Learning Enviroments. North Carolina: Pennsylvania State University, 1999.

Kop, R. «The Challenges to Connectivist Learning on Open Online Networks: Learning Experiences During a Massive Open Online Course”.» The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning 12, nº 3 (2011): 19-38.

Ouadoud, M., A. Nejjari, M. Chkouri, y K. El-Kad. «Learning management system and the underlying learning theories. In Proceedings of the mediterranean symposium on smart city applications.» Springer International Publishing, 2017: 732-744.

Pange , A., y J. Pange. «Is E-learning Based On Learning Theories? A Literature Review.» International Journal of Educational and Pedagogical Sciences 5, nº 8 (2011): 932-936.

Piaget, J. The origins of intelligence in children. Kansas: International Universities Press, 1952.

Roberts, M., y N. Pennington. The cognitive revolution in psychology. Waveland Press, 1996.

Schunk, D. Teorías del aprendizaje: una perspectiva educativa. México: Pearson, 2012.

Siemens, G. «Connectivism: A Learning Theory for the Digital Age.» International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning 2, nº 1 (2004): 3-10.

Skinner, B. F. The Behavior of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis - B. F. New York: Appleton-Century, 1938.

Sternberg, R. J. «The researching practice of learners based on educational technology and socio-constructivism.» Ciencia Unemi 9, nº 17 (2006): 118-124.

Thorndike, E. L. «The original nature of man. Educational Psychology, Vol 1:.» Teachers College (Palala Press), 2012.

Tunnermann, C. «El constructivismo y el aprendizaje de los estudiantes.» UDUAL 448 (2011): 21–32.

UNESCO. «¿Reanudación o reforma? .» 2022. www.unesco.org/open-access/terms-use-ccbysa-sp (último acceso: 21 de 07 de 2023).

Villalobos, E. Didáctica integrativa y el proceso de aprendizaje. México: Editorial Trillas, 2002.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 David Rojas Londoño, Cristina Velasquez, Francisco Xavier Dillon Pérez

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.