Revista Educación - Journal of Education ISSN Impreso: 0379-7082 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2644

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/educacion/oai
Social Contexts and Educational Innovation Trends: A Bibliographical Mapping Analysis
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

Keywords

Educational trends
Educational innovation
Educational strategies
Educational environment
Tendencia educacional
Innovación educacional
Estrategias educativas
Ambiente educacional

How to Cite

Ramírez, L. N. R. (2019). Social Contexts and Educational Innovation Trends: A Bibliographical Mapping Analysis. Revista Educación - Journal of Education, 44(1), 381–398. https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.33222

Abstract

Educational innovation is a pending item on the agendas of international educational institutions. Whereas current educational policies highlight the importance of educational innovation as a key element for improving the quality of education and promoting social development, the social aspect of innovation involves multidisciplinary interaction from a sociocultural perspective. After conducting a systematic bibliographical search of two main databases: SCOPUS and WoS (period ranging from 2013-2017), a total sample (N = 43) was filtered with established inclusion / exclusion criteria (keywords, document type, year of publication, area of discipline) and validity (quality and relevance). The countries with the highest number of publications in this subject are the United States (5), Spain (4) and the United Kingdom (3). The social contexts in which educational innovation strategies have been executed include educational organizations (37), the corporate sector (5) and healthcare institutions (1). Innovation is addressed as it pertains to new ways of organizing activities (29). Findings involve three key social contexts for implementing innovative strategies in six emerging areas of research.

https://doi.org/10.15517/revedu.v44i1.33222
PDF (Español (España))
HTML (Español (España))

References

Aguerrondo, I. (1992). La innovación educativa en América Latina: balance de cuatro décadas. Perspectivas, 22(3), 379–395.

Chipembele, M., & Bwalya, K. (2016). Assessing e-readiness of the Copperbelt University, Zambia: case study. International Journal of Information & Learning Technology, 33(5), 315–332. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJILT-12-2015-0036

Derbel, F. (2017). Technology-Capable Teachers Transitioning to Technology- Challenged Schools. Electronic Journal of E-Learning, 15(3), 269–280.

Etzkowitz, H. (2012). Triple helix clusters: boundary permeability at university – industry – government interfaces as a regional innovation strategy. Environment and Planning C: Government and Policy, 30(5), 766–779. https://doi.org/10.1068/c1182

Farré-Perdiguer, M., Sala-Rios, M., & Torres-Solé, T. (2016). Network analysis for the study of technological collaboration in spaces for innovation . Science and technology parks and their relationship with the university. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 13(8), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-016-0012-3

Faulkner, J., Latham, G., & Latham, G. (2016). Adventurous Lives : Teacher Qualities for 21st Century Learning. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 41(4), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.14221/ajte.2016v41n4.9

Fourie, J. E. E., & Fourie, U. U. (2016). Obstacles in Implementing Innovative Practices in Early Childhood Development Centers. Antropologist, 24(3), 799–809.

Frane, A., & Westlund, H. (2013). Innovation in Socio-Cultural Context. New York, N.Y.: Routledge, Editorial.

Hannan, A., English, S., & Silver, H. (1999). Why Innovate? Some Preliminary Findings form a Research Project on “Innovations in Teaching and Learning in Higher Education.” Studies in Higher Education, 24(3), 279–289.

Islam, M. S., & Grönlund, A. (2016). An international literature review of 1: 1 computing in schools. Journal of Educational Change, 17(2), 191–222. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10833-016-9271-y

Kazakoff, E. R., Sullivan, A., & Bers, M. U. (2013). The Effect of a Classroom-Based Intensive Robotics and Programming Workshop on Sequencing Ability in Early Childhood. Early Chidhood Educational Journal, 41(4), 245–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-012-0554-5

Khanlari, A. (2016). Teachers’ perceptions of the benefits and the challenges of integrating educational robots into primary/elementary curricula. European Journal of Engineering Education, 41(3), 320–330. https://doi.org/10.1080/03043797.2015.1056106

Kitchenham, B., Pretorius, R., Budgen, D., Brereton, O. P., Turner, M., Niazi, M., & Linkman, S. (2010). Systematic literature reviews in software engineering – A tertiary study. Information and Software Technology, 52(8), 792–805. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2010.03.006

Kryukov, V. (2016). Digital Technologies as Education Innovation at Universities. Journal of Internet Banking and Commerce, 21(3), 1–19.

Kunc, P., & Likar, B. (2014). Innovation in secondary education: A threat or a recipe for survival. Didactica Slovenica - Pedagoska Obzorja, 29(2), 32–45.

Laine, K., Leino, M., & Pulkkinen, P. (2015). Open Innovation Between Higher Education and Industry. Journal Knowldege Economy Economy, 6, 589–610. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0259-2

Maritz, A., Waal, A. De, Buse, S., Herstatt, C., Lassen, A., & Maclachlan, R. (2014). Innovation education programs: toward a conceptual framework. European Journal of Innovation Management, 17(2), 166–182. https://doi.org/10.1108/EJIM-06-2013-0051

Mok, K. H. (2013). The quest for an entrepreneurial university in East Asia : impact on academics and administrators in higher education. Asian Pacific Educational Review, 14(1), 11–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-013-9249-x

Mok, K., & Kan, Y. (2013). Promoting Entrepreneurship and Innovation in China : Enhancing Research and Transforming University Curriculum. Frontiers of Education in China, 8(2), 173–197. https://doi.org/10.3868/s110-002-013-0014-3

OECD. (2010). The OECD Innovation Strategy: Getting a Head Start on Tomorrow. Paris: OECD Publishing.

OECD. (2015). The Innovation Imperative: Contributing to Productivity, Growth and Well-Being. Paris: OECD Publishing. http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264239814-en

OECD. (2016). Innovating Education and Educating for Innovation: The Power of Digital Technologies and Skills. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1787/9789264265097-en

Peng, Y. (2016). A Study of the Relationship among Leader-member Exchange , Creative the University Librarians. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 53(1), 27–61. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2016.531/0044.RS.AM

Petersen, K., Feldt, R., Mujtaba, S., & Mattsson, M. (2007). Systematic Mapping Studies in Software Engineering. En 10th International Conference on Evaluation and Assessment in Software Engineering (pp. 1–10).

Piirainen, K. A., Andersen, A. D., & Andersen, P. D. (2016). Foresight and the third mission of universities : the case for innovation system foresight. Foresight, 18(1), 24–40. https://doi.org/10.1108/FS-04-2014-0026

Ramírez-Montoya, M.S. (2012). Modelos y estrategias de enseñanza para ambientes innovadores. México: Editorial digital del Tecnológico de Monterrey

Randler, C., Demirhan, E., Wüst-Ackermann, P., & Desch, I. H. (2016). Influence of a Dissection Video Clip on Anxiety, Affect, and Self-Efficacy in Educational Dissection: A Treatment Study. CBE. Life Sciences Education, 15(1), 1–8. https://doi.org/10.1187/cbe.15-07-0144

Rey-Rocha, J., & López-Navarro, I. (2017). The fourth mission of hospitals and the role of researchers as innovation drivers in the public healthcare. Revista Española de Documentación Científica, 37(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.3989/redc.2014.1.1062

Richmond, G., & Tatto, M. T. (2016). Innovation in Educational Research. Journal of Teacher Education, 67(5), 360–362. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487116670866

Shanker, R., Bhanugopan, R., Heijden, B. I. J. M. Van Der, & Farrell, M. (2017). Organizational climate for innovation and organizational performance : The mediating effect of innovative work behavior. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 100, 67–77. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvb.2017.02.004

Sheih, C. (2015). Organizational Innovation Behavior in Taiwan’s University Libraries: A Quantitative Study. Journal of Educational Media and Library Science, 52(3), 231–267. https://doi.org/10.6120/JoEMLS.2015.523/0018.RS.AM

Støren, L. A. (2016). Factors That Promote Innovativeness and Being An Innovative Learner At Work – Results From PIAAC. European Journal of Education, 51(2), 176–192. https://doi.org/10.1111/ejed.12173

Tranfield, D., Denyer, D., & Smart, P. (2003). Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review. British Journal of Management, 14(3), 207–222. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.00375

Whitehead, D. (2009). Thoughts on Education and Innovation. Childhood Education, 85(2), 106B.

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.