Actualidades Investigativas en Educación ISSN electrónico: 1409-4703

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/aie/oai
A corpus linguistics application in the analysis of textbooks as national teaching instruments of English as a Second Language in Chile
PDF
HTML

Palabras clave

teaching guides
CEFRL
teachers
students
manuales de enseñanza
MCER
docente
estudiante

Cómo citar

Arellano A., R. (2018). A corpus linguistics application in the analysis of textbooks as national teaching instruments of English as a Second Language in Chile. Actualidades Investigativas En Educación, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i1.31807

Resumen

The Ministry of Education (MINEDUC) bases the instruction of English in Chile in the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages: Learning, Teaching, Assessment (CEFRL), however its guidelines have not been systematically considered in the practice of creating instructional material in the EFL context of this country. To analyze this issue, this article presents the comparison of the vocabulary about Teaching English to Speakers of Other Languages (TESOL) used in the CEFRL and the English textbooks used in Chile regarding the categories of curriculum design, language teaching methodology and language assessment. The methodology was mixed, not experimental, cross-sectional and descriptive, including the analysis of the CEFRL document and the 8 English textbooks used in Chile in the public sector. Firstly, the data was compared quantitatively using the software Nvivo9 and later some key words (learners / students - teachers) were analyzed quantitatively in terms of frequency and qualitatively using collocations. Results suggest that similar vocabulary is used in both, the CEFRL and Chilean textbooks in terms of “language teaching methodology” (36% and 33% respectively), but it varies highly in the category of “curriculum design” (22% and 48% respectively) and mostly in “language assessment” (42% and 19% respectively) while showing different frequencies in the key words and their associated verbs between “students” (1,33%) and “teacher” (0,18%). These results show a constructivist approach in both, but with a minor behaviorist aspect especially in textbooks, indicating relevant differences in the emphasis and coherence between different areas of the instruction.
https://doi.org/10.15517/aie.v18i1.31807
PDF
HTML

Citas

Alderson, J. Charles, Clapham, Caroline and Wall, Dianne. (1995). Language test construction and evaluation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Ander-Egg, Ezequiel. (1996). La planificación educativa: conceptos, métodos, estrategias y técnicas para educadores. Buenos Aires, Argentina: Editorial Magisterio del Río de la Plata.

Bachman, Lyle, F., and Palmer, Adrian, S. (1996). Language testing in practice. Designing and developing useful language tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Barahona, Malba. (2016). Challenges and Accomplishments of ELT at Primary Level in Chile: Towards the Aspiration of Becoming a Bilingual Country. Educational Policy Analysis Archives, 24(82), 1-29.

Barber, Michael and Mourshed, Mona. (2007). How the World's Best-Performing School Systems Come Out On Top. s.l.: McKinsey and Company.

Barton, David. (1994). Literacy: An Introduction to the Ecology of Written Language. Oxford: Blackwell.

Brown, Annie. (2005). Self-assessment of writing in independent language programs: The value of annotated samples. Assessing Writing, 10(3), 174-191.

Byrd, Patricia. (2001). Textbooks: Evaluation for selection and analysis for implementation (4th ed.). In Marianne Celce-Murcia, M. Donna Brinton and Ann Marguerite Snow (Eds.), Teaching English as a second or foreign language (pp. 415-427). Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.

Canagarajah, A. Suresh. (1993). American textbooks and Tamil students: Discerning ideological tensions in the ESL classroom. Language, Culture and Curriculum, 6(2), 143-156.

Cook, Vivian. (2001). Second Language Learning and Language Teaching. London: Edward Arnold.

Council for Cultural Co-operation. (2001). Common European framework of reference for languages: Learning, teaching, assessment: Education Committee. Modern Languages Division. Strasborg: Press Syndicate of the University of Cambridge.

Deci, Edward and Ryan, Richard. (2000). Self-Determination Theory and the Facilitation of Intrinsic Motivation, Social Development, and Well-Being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68-78.

Denzin, Norman and Lincoln, Yvonna. (2005). The Sage handbook of qualitative research. California: SAGE Publishing.

Flowerdew, Lynne. (2005). An integration of corpus - based and genre - based approaches to text analysis in EAP / ESP: Countering criticisms against corpus-based methodologies. English for specific purposes, 24(3), 321-332.

Flowerdew, Lynne. (2008). Corpora and context in professional writing. In Vijay. K. Bhatia, John. Flowerdew, Lynne and Rodney, Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 115-127). London: Routledge.

Fulcher, Glenn and Davidson, Fred. (2007). Language Testing and Assessment. London and New York: Routledge.

Garret, Peter and Shortall, Terry. (2002). Learners’ evaluation of teacher-fronted and student-centred classroom activities. Language Teaching Research, 6(1), 25-57.

Graves, Kathleen. (2001). A framework of course development processes. In David. R., Hall and Ann Hewings (Eds.), Innovation in English language teaching: a reader, (pp. 178-196). London: Routledge.

Guilloteaux, Marie J., and Dörnyei, Zoltán. (2008). Motivating language learners: A classroom-oriented investigation of the effects of motivational strategies on student motivation. TESOL Quarterly, 42(1), 55-77.

Härmälä, Marita. (2010). Linguistic, sociolinguistic, and pragmatic competence as criteria in assessing vocational language skills: the case of Finland. Melbourne Papers in Language Testing, 15(2), 1-43.

Harmer, Jeremy. (2007). The practice of English language teaching. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Hedge, Tricia. (2000). Teaching and Learning in the Language Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Hughes, Arthur. (2003). Testing for Language Teachers. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jiménez, Carlos. (2004). El Marco Europeo Común de Referencia para las Lenguas y la comprensión teórica del conocimiento del lenguaje: exploración de una normatividad flexible para emprender acciones educativas. Revista FESC. Divulgación Científica Multidisciplinaria, 4(14), 1-22.

Kalaja, Paula and Ferreira, Ana María. (2003). Beliefs about SLA: New Research Approaches. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Kaufman, Dorit. (2004). Constructivist issues in language learning and teaching. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 24(1), 303-319.

Lantolf, James, P., and Poehner, Matthew, E. (2004). Dynamic Assessment: Bringing the past into the future, Journal of Applied Linguistics, 1, 49-74.

Lee, David. (2007). Corpora and discourse analysis: New ways of doing old things. In Vijay K. Bhatia, John Flowerdew and Rodney Jones (Eds.), Advances in Discourse Studies (pp. 86-99). London: Routledge.

Leech, Nancy L. and Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. (2011). Beyond Constant Comparison Qualitative Data Analysis: Using NVivo. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(1), 70-84.

Mella, Orlando. (2003). Metolodología Cualitativa en Ciencias Sociales y Educación. Santiago: Editorial Primus.

McKay, Sandra. (2003). Teaching English as an international language: the Chilean context. ELT Journal, 57(2), 139-148.

Ministerio de Educación (MINEDUC). (2002). Objetivos Fundamentales y Contenidos Mínimos Obligatorios de la Educación Básica. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de Chile.

Ministerio de Educación (MINEDUC). (2009). Fundamentos del Ajuste Curricular en el sector de Idioma Extranjero, Inglés. Santiago, Chile: Ministerio de Educación, Gobierno de Chile.

Nunan, David and Bailey, Kathleen. (2009). Exploring Second Language Classroom Research: A Comprehensive Guide. Boston: Heinle, Cengage Learning.

Nunan, David. (2004). Task-Based Language Teaching. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.

O’Dowd, Elizabeth. (2010). The development of linguistic complexity: A functional continuum. Language Teaching, 45(3), 329-346.

Orafi, Senussi and Borg, Simon. (2009). Intentions and realities in implementing a communicative curriculum reform. System 37, 243-253.

Pérez, Sergio. (2009). Etnocentrismo y Discriminación en la Educación Chilena: Consecuencias en la identidad sociocultural de estudiantes mapuches de la Región de la Araucanía (Unpublished doctoral thesis). Universidad de Extremadura, Spain.

Richards, Jack. (2001). Curriculum Development in Language Teaching. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.

Scrivener, Jim. (2005). Learning teaching: A guidebook for English Language Teachers. London: London: Macmillan ELT.

Ur, Penny. (1999). A Course in Language Teaching. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wittgenstein, Ludwig. (1972). Philosophical investigations. London: Pearson Education Limited.

Yu, Chong, Ho, Jannasch-Pennell, Angel and Di Gangi, Samuel. (2011). Compatibility between Text Mining and Qualitative Research in the Perspectives of Grounded Theory, Content Analysis, and Reliability. The Qualitative Report, 16(3), 730-744.

Comentarios

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.