Agronomía Costarricense ISSN Impreso: 0377-9424 ISSN electrónico: 2215-2202

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/agrocost/oai
Effect of charges in post-harvest handling on the quiality and shelf-life of coyote coriander
PDF (Español (España))

Keywords

cilantro coyote
postharvest handling
washing
mechanical damage
storage
shelf life
culantro coyote
manejo poscosecha
lavado
daño mecánico
almacenamiento
vida útil

How to Cite

Cerdas Araya, M. del M., & Montero Calderón, M. (2016). Effect of charges in post-harvest handling on the quiality and shelf-life of coyote coriander. Agronomía Costarricense, 40(1). https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v40i1.25330

Abstract

Effect of charges in post-harvest handling on the quality and shelf-life of coyote coriander (Eryngium foedium L.) for export. The effect several of changes in post-harvest practices of coyote coriander for export was determined: hand shaking of coriander tied and loose bunches; plastic loops instead of rubber bands to hold bunches together; a commercial surfactant (TA, Vega-AKleen, 15 g.l-1) incorporated in washing solution; 3 speeds of centrifugation; 2 packaging materials and 3 storage temperatures. Hand shaking of tied bunches increased mechanical damage to 87%, in contrast with 63% for untied bunches. The use of the surfactant increased up to 30% excess water elimination during the first 5 minutes of passive drainage, as compared with produce washed with pure water, and also lead to larger insect recovery (37/bunch with surfactant, and 19/ bunch without). When hand shaking was used after washing, insect extraction was larger (56 and 48/ bunch, respectively). Water drainage increased from 33 to 84 ml/100 g when centrifugation speed increased from 25 to 50 and 75 rpm in the first minute, but no further changes were observed after additional timing (2-5 minutes) for 75 rpm; however, mechanical damages were 15 and 20% less at 25 and 50 rpm, in contrast with 30% at 75 rpm. As for substitution of rubber bands with plastic loops, the latter allowed 11% of mechanical damage reduction. Storage temperature at 10°C best preserved product quality, regardless of the packaging material, showing less than 5% of yellow leaves and less than 1% of necrosis and Cercospora damage symptoms after 15 days of storage.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rac.v40i1.25330
PDF (Español (España))

References

AHARONI N., RODOV V., FALLIK E., AFEK U., CHALUPOWICZ D., AHARON Z., MAURER D., ORENSTEIN J. 2007. Modified atmosphere packaging for vegetable crops using high-watervapor- permeable films, pp. 73-112. In: Ch.L. Wilson (ed.). Intelligent and active packaging for fruits and vegetables. CRC Press Taylor&Francis Group.

ALVARADO C., VILLALOBOS J. 1999. El cultivo del culantro coyote (Eryngium foetidum L., APIACEA) para exportación. MAG, San José, C.R. 23 p.

CANTWELL M., REID M. 2002. Postharvest Handling Systems: Fresh Herbs, pp. 327-331. In: A. Kader (ed.). Postharvest Technology of Horticultural Crops. University of California.

CERDAS M.M. 2010. Documento técnico respaldo para elaborar Norma Codex de culantro coyote. Laboratorio Poscosecha, CIA, UCR. San José, C.R. 11 p.

CODEX STAN 304-R. 2011. Norma Regional de Codex para el culantro coyote. 4 p.

COLEGIO DE INGENIEROS AGRÓNOMOS. 2003. Del café al culantro coyote. Boletín Informativo N°. 40. San José, Costa Rica. 8 p.

FAO. 2015. Propuesta Modelo General de Normas Codex de Frutas y Hortalizas. FAO, Roma. 22 p.

KAYS S. 1997. Postharvest physiology of perishable plant products. Exon Press, USA. 532 p.

LUO Y., McEVOY J., WACHTEL M., GANG J., HUANG Y. 2004. Package Atmosphere Affects Postharvest Biology and Quality of Fresh-cut Cilantro Leaves. HortSciencie 39(3):567-570.

MACNAB A., SHERF A., SPRINGER J. 1983. Identifying diseases of vegetables. College of Agriculture, The Pennsylvania State University. 62 p.

MAG. 2012. Guía técnica para la inspección de culantro coyote (Erygium foetidum) para la exportación. Costa Rica. 29 p.

MOHAMMED M., WICKMAN L. 1995. Postharvest retardation of senescence in shado benni (Eryngium foetidum). Journal of Foood Quality 18(4):325-334.

NAMESNY A. 1993. Post-recolección de hortalizas. Ediciones de Horticultura, S.L. Barcelona. 330 p.

SUBGGAK R., KULKARNI P. 1998. Leafy Vegetables, pp. 533-588. In: D. SALUNKHE and S. KADAM (eds.). Handbook of Vegetable Science and Technology. Marcel Dekker, Inc

Comments

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.