Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences ISSN Impreso: 1659-1046 ISSN electrónico: 2215-3411

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/Odontos/oai
Scientometric Analysis of the Scientific Productivity of "Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences": Collaborative Networks, Trends and Dynamicity
PDF
HTML
EPUB

Keywords

Bibliometrics; Scholarly output; Scientific productivity
Bibliometría; Producción académica; Productividad científica

How to Cite

Espinoza-Carhuancho, F. ., Reyes-Carmona, J. F., Vilchez, L., Medina, J., Galarza-Valencia, D., & Mayta-Tovalino, F. (2024). Scientometric Analysis of the Scientific Productivity of "Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences": Collaborative Networks, Trends and Dynamicity. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences, 74–84. https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.58992

Abstract

This study aim to analyze the scientific productivity of the journal "Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences" during the period from 2019 to 2023. Manuscripts were selected from the Scopus database using the search criterion `SRCTITLE ("Odovtos-International Journal of Dental Sciences") AND PUBYEAR > 2019 AND PUBYEAR < 2024`. During the evaluated period, 164 manuscripts were identified in the journal. Of these, 36 articles, 14 reviews, 7 editorials, and 7 letters to the editor were evaluated. The selected manuscripts were analyzed in terms of their content, authors, institutions, countries of origin, keywords provided by the authors, and citations received. Amaury De Jesús Pozos-Guillen, from the Universidad Autónoma de San Luis Potosí in Mexico, had the highest academic production with a total of 10 publications. Adrián Gómez-Fernández, from the University of Costa Rica, showed a high Field-Weighted Citation Impact (Field-Weighted Citation Impact) with a value of 0.45, having received 43 citations in total. The University of Costa Rica led in terms of academic production with 44 publications. The Universidad Científica del Sur in Peru produced 15 publications. Despite having only 5 publications, the Universidad Arturo Prat in Chile achieved a high citation impact weighted by field of 0.86. The results of the analysis provided valuable insight into scholarly production and collaboration among authors in the journal. The findings of this study may be useful for researchers, journal editors, and policy makers to better understand the dynamics and trends in the field of dental sciences.

https://doi.org/10.15517/ijds.2024.58992
PDF
HTML
EPUB

References

de Marco A. Metrics and evaluation of scientific productivity: would it be useful to normalize the data taking in consideration the investments? Microb Cell Fact. 2019; 18 (1): 181.

Reyes-Carmona J. Peer Reviews in Scientific Journals: Recommendations from ODOVTOS. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2021; 23 (3): 10-22.

Thwaites T. Research metrics: Calling science to account. Nature. 2014; 511 (7510): 57-60.

Reyes Carmona J. Editor-in-Chief Editorial. Odovtos - International Journal of Dental Sciences. 2015;17 (3): 9.

Cabanillas-Lazo M., Quispe-Vicuña C., Loli-Guevara S., Mego J.C., Ruiz-Yaringaño A.J., Barja-Ore J., et al. A 10-year scientometric analysis of the academic publications of the 27 Peruvian Scientific Societies of Medical Students. Educación Médica. 2023; 24 (1): 100771.

Butler D. Investigating journals: The dark side of publishing. Nature News 2013; 495: 433.

Eriksson S., Helgesson G. The false academy: predatory publishing in science and bioethics. Med Health Care Philos 2017; 20: 163-70.

Ioannidis J.P. The mass production of redundant, misleading, and conflicted systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Milbank Q 2016; 94: 485-514.

Shamseer L., Moher D., Maduekwe O., Turner L., Barbour V., Burch R., et al. Potential predatory and legitimate biomedical journals: can you tell the difference? A cross-sectional comparison. BMC Medicine 2017; 15: 28.

Demir S.B. Scholarly databases under scrutiny. Journal of Librarianship and Information Science 2018; 52: 150-60.

Alhajj M.N., Al-Sanabani F.A., Alkheraif A.A., Smran A., Alqerban A., Samran A. Bibliometric analysis and evaluation of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry from 1970 to 2019. J Prosthet Dent. 2023; 129 (2): 323-340.

Ahmad P., Slots J. A bibliometric analysis of periodontology. Periodontol 2000. 2021; 85 (1): 237-240.

Khan A.S., Ur Rehman S., Ahmad S., AlMaimouni Y.K., Alzamil M.A.S., Dummer P.M.H. Five decades of the International Endodontic Journal: Bibliometric overview 1967-2020. Int Endod J. 2021; 54 (10): 1819-1839.

Chen M.C., Chen S.H., Cheng C.D., Chung C.H., Mau L.P., Sung C.E., Weng P.W., Cathy Tsai Y.W., Shieh Y.S., Huang R.Y., Cheng W.C. Mapping out the bibliometric characteristics of classic articles published in a Taiwanese academic journal in dentistry: A scopus-based analysis. J Dent Sci. 2023; 18 (4): 1493-1509.

Bhalla V.K., Chockattu S.J. Publication trends in journal of clinical and experimental dentistry. J Clin Exp Dent. 2020; 12 (9): e857-e863.

Mayta-Tovalino F., Quispe-Vicuña C., Cabanillas-Lazo M., Munive-Degregori A., Guerrero M.E., Mendoza R. A Bibliometric Analysis of the International Dental Journal (2011-2020). Int Dent J. 2023; 73 (1): 157-162.

Salcedo A. Perspectives on peer-review and editorial activities of Peruvian dental researchers. Rev Cient Odontol. 2023; 11 (4): e170.

Comments

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Copyright (c) 2024 CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.