Lenguas modernas; literatura; creación; didáctica

Revista de Lenguas Modernas ISSN Impreso: 1659-1933 ISSN electrónico: 2215-5643

OAI: https://www.revistas.ucr.ac.cr/index.php/rlm/oai
La Evaluación de la competencia lingüística de inglés en estudiantes de primaria
PDF (English)
EPUB (English)
HTML (English)

Palabras clave

summative language assessment
diagnostic test
young language learners
formative assessments
Essential language skills
evaluaciones sumativas de lenguas extranjeras
prueba diagnóstica
estudiantes de primaria de idiomas
evaluaciones formativas
habilidades esenciales del lenguaje

Cómo citar

Quesada Pacheco, A. G. (2023). La Evaluación de la competencia lingüística de inglés en estudiantes de primaria : Estrategias formativas y sumativas. Revista De Lenguas Modernas, (36). https://doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i36.48313

Resumen

Este artículo proporciona una descripción completa de las evaluaciones formativas y pruebas de idiomas sumativas para estudiantes de primaria, incluyendo los procesos en el desarrollo de un examen diagnóstico en inglés para la población de escuela primaria. Se destaca la importancia de determinar el nivel de competencia en inglés de los jóvenes aprendices, y se exploran diversas técnicas de evaluación en el aula. El artículo cubre tanto la evaluación formativa, que permite retroalimentación continua y monitoreo del progreso en el aula, como la evaluación sumativa. Se examinan detalladamente las cua- tro habilidades esenciales del lenguaje: escuchar, hablar, leer y escribir, y se discuten estrategias para evaluar cada habilidad. También se enfatiza la necesidad de utilizar los resultados de la evaluación con fines diagnósticos para mejorar los resultados de la enseñanza y el aprendizaje. Por último, el artículo está dirigido a educadores de idiomas y responsables de políticas educativas que buscan mejorar la enseñanza y evaluación de idiomas extranjeros en entornos de educación primaria.

https://doi.org/10.15517/rlm.v0i36.48313
PDF (English)
EPUB (English)
HTML (English)

Citas

Bibliography

Afflerbach, P. (2012). Understanding and using reading assessment, K-12. Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

ALTE (2011). Manual for language testing development and examining: For use with the CEFR.

Council of Europe. Retrieved from https://rm.coe.int/manual-for-language-test-development-and-examining-for-use-with-the-ce/1680667a2b

Ashcraft, N., & Tran, A. (Eds.) (2010). Teaching listening: Voices from the field. Alexandra,VA: TESOL Press

Asher, J. 1988. Learning another language through actions: The complete teacher's guidebook. Los Gatos, CA: Sky Oaks Productions.

Boyle, A., & Hutchinson, D. (2009). Sophisticated tasks in e-assessment: What are they and what are their benefits? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34 (3), 305- 319.

Brown, J. D. (1998). New ways of classroom assessment. Alexandria, VA: TESOL.

Brown, H. D. (2003) Language assessment. Principles and classroom practices. Pearson Longman, San Francisco, California.

Brown, H. D. (2004). Language assessment: principles and classroom practices. New York:Pearson Education.

Bryant, William (2017). Developing a Strategy for Using Technology-Enhanced Items in Large Scale Standardized Tests. Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 22(1). Retrieved from http://pareonline.net/getvn.asp?v=22&n=1

Bachman, L. F. (1990). Fundamental considerations in language testing. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Behfrouz, B. & Nahvi, E. (2013). The Effect of Task Characteristics on IELTS ReadingPerformance. Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3 (1), pp. 30-39

Buck, G. (2001). Assessing listening. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Bulut, B. & Ertem, I. (2018). A Think-Aloud study: Listening comprehension strategies used by primary school students. Faculty of Education, Adnan Menderes University, Aydın, Turkey. Retrieved from: https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1175612.pdf

Butler, Y. G & Lee, J. (2010). On-task versus off-task among Korean elementary school students studying English. The Modern Language Journal, 90 (4), 506-518.

Cambridge ESOL (2011) Using the CEFR: Principles of Good Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge ESOL. Retrieved from https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/images/126011-using-cefr-principles-of-good-practice.pdf

Chapelle, C. & Douglas, D. (2006) Assessing language through computer technology

Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Center for Applied Linguistics. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/38423343/COMPUTER_ASSISTED_LANGUAGE_TESTING_CALT_ISSUES_AND_CHALLENGES

Cohen, L. (2020). The power of portfolios. Retrieved from https://www.scholastic.com/teachers/articles/teaching-content/power-portfolios/

Curtain, H. A., & Dahlberg, C. A. (2016). Languages and children, making the match: new languages for young learners, Grades K-8. Pearson Education.

Darmuki, A., Andayani, A., Nurkamto, J. & Saddhono, K. (2017). The development and evaluation of the speaking learning model by cooperative approach. Surakarta State University, Indonesia Retrieved from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/324172989_The_Development_and_Evaluation_of_Speaking_Learning_Model_by_Cooperative_Approach

Encalada, M. R. (2018). Role-plays as an assessment tool in English as a foreign language (EFL) class. In Sandy Soto, Eder Intriago Palacios & Johnny Villafuerte. Beyond Paper-and Paper Tests: Good Assessment practices for EFL Classes (pp. 49-73). Machala, Ecuador: Editorial UTMACH.

Flutcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2007). Language testing and assessment: An advanced resource book. New York, NY: Routledge

Flutcher, G. & Davidson, F. (2017). The Routledge handbook of language testing. New York, NY:Routledge

Garton, S., & Copland, F. (Eds.). (2019). The Routledge Handbook of Teaching English to Young Learners (1st ed.). Routledge.

Jodoin, M.G. (2003). Measurement efficiency of innovative item formats in computer-based testing. Journal of Educational Measurement, 40, 1-15.

Kagan, S. L., Shepard, L., & Wurtz, E. (1998). Principles and recommendations for early childhood assessments. Washington D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office

Kagan, S. L. (1999). A5 Redefining 21st-Century Early Care and Education. Young Children. 54(6). p. 2-3.

Kane, M. (2006). Content-related validity evidence in test development. In S.M. Downing & T.M. Haladyna (Eds.) Handbook of Test Development. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Katz, L. G. (1997). A Development Approach to Assessment of Young Children. ERIC Digest Ketabi, Somaye & Somaye. (2015). Different methods of assessing writing among EFL teachers in Iran different methods of assessing writing among EFL teachers in Iran. International Journal of Research Studies in Language Learning. Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/278329954_Different_methods_of_assessing_writing_among_EFL_teachers_in_Iran_Different_methods_of_assessing_writing_among_EFL_teachers_in_Iran

Luoma, S, (2004). Assessing speaking. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

McKay, P. (2008). Assessing Young Language Learners. UK: Cambridge University Press.

McNamara, M. J. and D. Deane. 1995. Self-assessment activities: Towards autonomy in language learning. TESOL Journal, 5, 1, pp. 17-21.

Noijons, J. (1994). Testing computer assisted language tests: Towards a checklist for CALT.CLICO Journal, 12(1), 37-58

Parshall, C.G., Harmes, J.C., Davey, T., & Pashley, P. (2010). Innovative items for computerized testing. In W.J. van der Linden & C.A.W. Glas (Eds.) Computerized adaptive testing: theory and practice (2nd. ed.). Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Pierce, L. V. & J. M. O'Malley. 1992. Performance and portfolio assessment for language minority students. Washington, DC: National Clearinghouse for Bilingual Education.

Russell, C. and Shepherd, J. (2010). Online role-play environments for higher education. British Journal of Educational Technology 41(6), 992–1002.

Smith, J., Brewer, D. & Heffner, T. (2003). Using portfolio assessments with young children who are at risk for school failure: Preventing school failure. 48. 10.1080/1045988X.2003.10871078.

Stevens, G. & DeBord, K. (2001). Issues of assessment in testing children under age eight. TheForum for Family and Consumer Issues, 6 (2). pp 1-7.

Tannenbaum, J. (1996). Practical ideas on alternative assessment for ESL students. ERIC Digest. ED395500, Washington, DC: ERIC Clearinghouse on Languages and Linguistics.

Tarrant, M., Knierim, A., Hayes, S.K., & Ware (2006). The frequency of item writing flaws in multiple-choice questions used in high stakes nursing assessments. Nurse Education Today, 26 (8), 354-363.

Wolf, K. M., & Butler, Y. G. (2017). English Language Proficiency Assessments for Young Learners (1st ed.). Routledge.

Wright, A. (2002), Storytelling with children. Oxford University Press 978-

Comentarios

Creative Commons License

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución-NoComercial-SinDerivadas 4.0.

Derechos de autor 2022 Allen G. Quesada Pacheco

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.