1
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
Species diversity and spatial distribution of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae)
from La Isla Amazon Park, Napo Province, Ecuador
Linda Jacome1*; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4025-3769
Jonathan Liria2; https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-8364
Richard C. Wilkerson3; https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6366-1357
1. Ingeniería en Ecosistemas, Facultad de Ciencias de la Vida, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Napo, Ecuador;
linda.jacome@est.ikiam.edu.ec (*Correspondence)
2. Grupo de Investigación en Población y Ambiente, Universidad Regional Amazónica Ikiam, Napo, Ecuador;
jonathan.liria@ikiam.edu.ec
3. Department of Entomology, National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington DC, United
States of America; wilkersonr@si.edu
Received 18-V-2023. Corrected 09-VII-2023. Accepted 09-X-2023.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Vector-borne diseases are prevalent in the Amazon and Coastal regions of Ecuador. However,
there is a scarcity of mosquito ecology studies in these areas. The most recent list of species reported for the
country comprises 8 tribes, 22 genera, and 200 species.
Objectives: To document the Culicidae species found in La Isla Amazon Park, Napo, Ecuador, including those
with epidemiological significance; and to analyze their composition, abundance, and diversity, focusing on larval
habitats during the dry and rainy periods.
Methods: We evaluated different larval habitats, considering collection duration as the primary criterion. We
used CDC and Shannon traps to collect adult mosquitoes during both rainy and dry periods. To assess sampling
effort, we used accumulation curves and non-parametric estimators of species richness, while we employed Hill
numbers to determine diversity. Additionally, we used the Berger-Parker and Pielou indices to evaluate species
dominance and evenness. We conducted cluster analysis and ANOSIM tests to assess the similarity between
habitats and the differences in taxonomic composition between periods.
Results: We collected a total of 802 individuals from 15 species and 4 taxonomic units, 5 genera, and 4 tribes.
Notably, this may be the first records of Wyeomyia felicia Dyar & Núñez Tovar and Culex derivator Dyar & Knab
from Ecuador. Additionally, the presence of Culex dunni Dyar and Psorophora ferox von Humboldt (both recog-
nized as vectors) was correlated with increased rainfall.
Conclusions: The abundance of mosquitoes, including potential vector species, increased during the rainy sea-
son, indicating a higher risk of pathogen transmission. However, the relationship between rainfall amount and
diversity patterns is not well-defined.
Key words: Phytotelmata; Sabethini; Culicini; recreational park; urban green area.
RESUMEN
Diversidad de especies y distribución espacial de mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae)
del Parque Amazónico La Isla, provincia de Napo, Ecuador
Introducción: Las enfermedades vectoriales son prevalentes en las regiones amazónica y costera de Ecuador. Sin
embargo, hay una escasez de estudios de ecología de mosquitos en estas áreas. En el país se ha reportado 8 tribus,
22 géneros y 200 especies.
https://doi.org/10.15517/rev.biol.trop..v71i1.55184
TERRESTRIAL ECOLOGY
2Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
INTRODUCTION
Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) are vec-
tors of pathogens that include viruses (arbovi-
ruses), filarial worms (helminths) and protozoa
that are significant causes of morbidity and
mortality worldwide, particularly in tropical
and subtropical countries (Bueno-Marí et al.,
2015). During the COVID-19 pandemic, the
significant surge in dengue cases across the
Americas emphasized the critical role of mos-
quitoes in public health (OPS/OMS, 2020).
Culicidae is diverse, currently with 3 718
species classified into two subfamilies. Anoph-
elinae comprised of three genera, Culicinae
divided into 11 tribes, encompassing 113 gen-
era (Harbach & Wilkerson, 2023). In Ecuador,
there are recorded species from both subfami-
lies, eight tribes, 22 genera, totaling 200 species
(Ponce et al., 2021; Ramón et al., 2019).
Although vector-borne diseases are preva-
lent in the Amazonian and Coastal regions of
Ecuador, there is a scarcity of ecological studies
focused on Culicidae, and the majority of the
existing research is relatively recent (Duque et
al., 2019; Navarro et al., 2015). According to
the Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador
(2020), Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecua-
dor (2021) and Ministerio de Salud Pública del
Ecuador (2022), Ecuador has repofigrted cases
of dengue, Zika, chikungunya, Mayaro, yellow
fever, and malaria. The number of dengue cases
has shown an upward trend, with 8 416 cases
reported in 2019, followed by 16 570 and 20 593
cases in 2020 and 2021, respectively. In terms of
dengue incidence, Napo province ranked third
in the Ecuadorian Amazon region in 2019.
However, there was a surge in cases in 2021,
surpassing all other provinces and recording
the highest number of dengue cases that year.
While malaria cases have also witnessed an
increase, they remain primarily concentrated in
other provinces within the Amazonian region.
Community and adventure tourism in
Napo has increased over the years, because of
the many existing attractions, high biodiversity,
and extensive protected areas. La Isla Amazon
Park (PALI, called after its Spanish initials) is an
urban and touristic green area for recreational
purposes and serves as a habitat for various
vertebrate species. PALI is essential for tourist
and ecological interests, as well as for public
health because a large flow of people and the
presence of possible vectors increases the prob-
ability and risk of disease transmission (Duque
et al., 2019).
Effective understanding and prevention of
arthropod-borne diseases hinges upon a com-
prehensive understanding of species composi-
tion, distribution, and ecology (Ceretti-Junior
Objetivos: Documentar las especies de Culicidae encontradas en el Parque Amazónico La Isla, Napo, Ecuador,
incluyendo aquellas con importancia epidemiológica; y analizar su composición, abundancia y diversidad, enfo-
cándose en los hábitats de las larvas durante los períodos seco y lluvioso.
Métodos: Evaluamos diferentes hábitats larvarios, con la duración de la recolecta como criterio. Las trampas
CDC y Shannon recolectaron mosquitos adultos durante los períodos seco y lluvioso. Evaluamos la riqueza de
especies con curvas de acumulación y estimadores no paramétricos, mientras que determinamos la diversidad
con los números de Hill. Además, utilizamos los índices de Berger-Parker y Pielou para evaluar la dominancia y la
uniformidad de las especies. Realizamos análisis de conglomerados y la prueba ANOSIM para evaluar la similitud
entre hábitats y estaciones, así como las diferencias en la composición taxonómica, respectivamente.
Resultados: Recolectamos un total de 802 individuos de 15 especies y 4 unidades taxonómicas, 5 géneros y 4
tribus. Este podría ser el primer registro de Wyeomyia felicia Dyar & Núñez Tovar y Culex derivator Dyar & Knab
en Ecuador. Además, la presencia de Culex dunni Dyar y Psorophora ferox von Humboldt (ambos potenciales
vectores) se correlacionó con el aumento de las precipitaciones.
Conclusiones: El aumento de la abundancia de mosquitos durante el periodo lluvioso indica un mayor riesgo de
transmisión de patógenos. Sin embargo, la relación entre la cantidad de precipitaciones y los patrones de diver-
sidad no está bien definida.
Palabras clave: área urbana verde; Culicini; Fitotelma; Sabethini; parque recreacional.
3
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
et al., 2016). This study aimed to document
the Culicidae species found in La Isla Amazon
Park (PALI), Napo, Ecuador, including those
with epidemiological significance; and to ana-
lyze their composition, abundance, and diver-
sity, focusing on larval habitats during dry and
rainy periods.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Study site: The confluence of the Pano
and Tena rivers forms a peninsula known as
PALI in Tena, Napo province (0°59’44.45’’ S &
77°49’7.31’’ W; 0°59’49.39’’ S & 77°49’2.053’
W; 0°59’49.27’’ S & 77°49’5.92’’ W; 0°59’34.52’
S & 77°48’55.92’’ W). The Colonso Chalupas
Biological Reserve (RBCC), created in 2014, is
the closest protected area to PALI (Fig. 1). PALI
spans 24 hectares, featuring a native species
forest and a natural wetland; eight hectares are
designated for tourism, including four kilome-
ters of trails used in this study. Despite multiple
floods over the years, the park continues to be
inhabited by many species that were donated
to it in 1995, when it was opened. The park
is in a humid, tropical zone with abundant
bimodal rainfall (peaks tend to occur in June
and November), high relative humidity (> 85
%), and 22.8 °C mean annual temperature
(Lucas-Solis et al., 2021).
Ethics Statement: The authorization
for the Collection of Specimens of Biological
Diversity for Non-Commercial Purposes No.
1176 (MAAE-ARSFC-2021-1176) issued by the
Ministerio del Ambiente, Agua y Transición
Ecológica of Ecuador was processed.
The collected specimens were deposited
in the invertebrate wet section of the Museo de
Ciencias Naturalesat the Instituto Nacional de
Biodiversidad (INABIO), from catalog number
MECN-MA-8603 to MECN-MA-8620.
Culicidae collection: Collections of mos-
quitoes were carried out for immature and
adult stages during a rainy (26-28/07/2021)
and dry (29-31/03/2021) period. Immature
sampling points were plotted over the area
Fig. 1. Location map showing PALI sampling patches and relative position in Napo, Ecuador. Empty pins indicate the dry
period, and filled pins indicate the rainy period.
4Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
designated for tourism development. Sampling
was standardized by using collection duration
as the main criterion (30 min per patch) and
the number of sampling points was determined
by the availability of breeding sites along the
trail. Immatures were sampled in phytotelmata,
as well as in ponds and artificial containers.
For large water bodies, the systematic scoop-
ing technique was used; the pond margin was
subdivided into subsampling points. In other
words, the 30 min were divided by 5 min, which
means there were 6 subsampling points.
Thus, distance between points depended
on the diameter of the pond (Urbinatti et al.,
2001). The specimens were collected using a
suction pipette or dipper, depending on the
type of larval habitat, and temporarily stored
in sterilized sampling bags. Some immatures
were deposited in individual breeding vials for
development, and the remainder preserved in
cryovials with a 10 % formaldehyde solution.
The collected specimens were deposited in
the invertebrate wet section of the Museo de
Ciencias Naturales at the Instituto Nacional de
Biodiversidad (INABIO), from catalog number
MECN-MA-8603 to MECN-MA-8620.
Traps baited with dry ice (CO2) and UV
light were used to sample adult mosquitoes:
CDC trap and a modified Shannon trap, which
do not use animals as bait (Silver, 2008). The
CDC trap remained active for 14 h (18:00-
08:00) and Shannon traps remained active for
4 h (18:00-22:00). Periodic trap sampling was
carried out during that time, checking the out-
side and inside of the trap every 15 min for 5
min. Mosquitoes were collected using an insect
aspirator, sacrificed through low-temperature
exposure, mounted on entomological pins, and
stored in entomological boxes treated with
naphthalene and silica gel.
An AmScope trinocular stereo microscope
with white light and 90X magnification was
used for species recognition based on available
keys and taxonomic revisions (Forattini, 1965;
González & Darsie Jr., 1996; Lane, 1953a; Lane,
1953b; Liria & Navarro, 2003; Sallum Mureb
& Forattini, 1996; Valencia, 1973; Zavortink,
1972), and the interactive identification keys
of Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit (2021).
The genera and subgenera abbreviations follow
Wilkerson et al. (2015).
Data analysis: Sampling effort was
assessed using species accumulation curves and
nonparametric estimators of species richness:
Abundance-based Coverage Estimator (ACE),
Chao1, Jackknife 1, and Bootstrap (Colwell
et al., 2004). Randomizations (1 000) without
replacement and a 95 % confidence interval
were used. The upper limit of abundance for
rare or infrequent species used in the ACE sta-
tistic was 7, based on the categories proposed
by Friebe according to Lira-Vieira et al. (2013).
It is considered rare when D < 1 %, whereas D
% = (total number of individuals of the species
/ total number of individuals captured) * 100.
Diversity was estimated through Hill num-
bers (Jost & González-Oreja, 2012), where q is
the order of diversity (qD) and determines how
influential common species or rare species are
in the measurement. The first three Hill num-
bers, q = 0 (richness), q = 1 (Shannons expo-
nential diversity), and q = 2 (Simpsons inverse
diversity), were assessed to measure the effec-
tive number of species, an equivalent measure
of true diversity.
The Berger-Parker index and the Pielou
index were calculated to quantify the species
dominance and evenness component between
seasonal periods. The similarity between
habitats was assessed with a cluster analysis
(UPGMA) dendrogram, using the Bray-Curtis
distance matrix.
The differences in taxonomic composition
were assessed using the analysis of similarity
(ANOSIM) test with the Bray-Curtis distance
and 1 000 permutations, performing pairwise
comparisons using the Bonferroni correction.
ANOSIM is based on comparing distances
between groups with distances within groups,
and the resulting R-test statistic measures
whether there is a separation of community
structure, and the p-value determines signifi-
cant comparisons (Clarke, 1993).
The statistics were run in EstimateS Pro-
gram version 9.1.0 (Colwell, 2022), PAST
5
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
version 4.09 (Hammer, 2022), and Microsoft
Excel (Microsoft Corporation, 2016).
RESULTS
In total, 802 specimens (immatures and
adults) were collected, identified, and grouped
into 15 species and 3 taxonomic units: 10
subgenera, 5 genera, 4 tribes (Culicini: Culex,
Sabethini: Limatus and Wyeomyia, Aedini: Pso-
rophora, Toxorhynchitini: Toxorhynchites) from
7 types of larval habitats (Table 1, Table 2). Dur-
ing the dry period, 7 species and 3 taxonomic
units were recorded, compared to 13 species
and 2 taxonomic units for the rainy period.
Wyeomyia ulocoma (Theobald, 1903) was
the most abundant immature species, with 48
% of the total abundance recorded for the dry
period and 81 % in the rainy period, followed
by Wy. medioalbipes (Lutz, 1904) (28 %) during
the dry period and Culex urichii (Coquillett,
1906) (6 %) during the rainy period.
Both periods evaluated 12 breeding sites
corresponding to 7 types. Both periods have
four types of immature habitats (artificial, bro-
meliad, bamboo, and Heliconia spp.) in com-
mon. However, Calathea sp. (near Calathea
crotalifera) as a habitat was only reported dur-
ing the dry period, and tree holes and ponds
were only reported during the rainy period.
From the CDC and Shannon traps, 61
adult mosquitoes of 4 species and 3 taxonomic
units, 4 subgenera, 3 genera, and 3 tribes were
collected (Table 2). The Shannon trap was
Tabl e 1
Abundance and diversity of immature species by habitat and collection period.
Habitat SpeciesaAbundance Sbexp(H)c1/DddeJf
DRY PERIOD 253 7 4 3 0.48 0.69
Artificial Culex (Car.) urichii 24
3 2 2 0.59 0.82Limatus durhamii 13
Limatus sp. 1 4
Bamboo Culex (Car.) secundus 4
3 2 2 0.65 0.81Culex (Car.) urichii 15
Wyeomyia (Wyo.) melanopus 4
Bromeliad Wyeomyia (Wyo.) medioalbipes 67 1 1 1 1 -
Calathea Wyeomyia (Dec.) ulocoma 27 1 1 1 1 -
Heliconia Wyeomyia (Dec.) ulocoma 95 1 1 1 1 -
RAINY PERIOD 488 11 2 1 0.81 0.35
Artificial Culex (Car.) urichii 8 1 1 1 1 -
Bamboo Culex (Car.) secundus 18
4 3 2 0.48 0.69
Culex (Car.) urichii 19
Culex (Cux.) dolosus 2
Toxorhynchites (Lyn.) theobaldi 1
Bromeliad Culex (Mcx.) imitator 12 1 1 0.93 0.35
Wyeomyia (Wyo.) medioalbipes 14
Heliconia Wyeomyia (Dec.) felicia 12 2 1 1 0.97 0.19
Wyeomyia (Dec.) ulocoma 397
Pond Culex (Mel.) dunni 92 2 1 0.82 0.68
Culex (Ncx.) derivator 2
Tree hole Wyeomyia (Wyo.) celaenocephala 5 1 1 1 1 -
a: subgenera: (Car.) Carrollia Lutz, (Wyo.) Wyeomyia Theobald, (Dec.) Decamyia Dyar, (Ncx.) Neoculex Dyar, (Cux.) Culex
Linnaeus, (Mel.) Melanoconion Theobald, (Mcx.) Microculex Theobald, (Lyn.) Lynchiella Lahille. b: richness (0D); c: Shannon
diversity index (1D); d: Simpsons diversity index (2D); e: Berger-Parker dominance index; f: Pielous equality index.
6Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
more efficient than the CDC trap in recording
abundance during the dry (58 %) and rainy (69
%) periods. Psorophora dimidiata (Cerqueira,
1943) was the most abundant adult species,
with 42 % of total abundance recorded for the
dry period and 61 % in the rainy period.
The diversity of the dry period in both
immature and adult stage, when considering
all species with a weight proportional to their
abundance (Hill number 1) and giving more
weight to dominant species (Hill number 2)
showed a slight increase with four equally
common species and three effective species,
respectably (Table 1, Table 2). During the rainy
period, the Berger-Parker and Pielou indices
indicate that there was a greater dominance of
certain species and less uniformity in the abun-
dance of species, corroborating that rare species
were mainly recorded during this period.
Diversity by larval habitat showed bam-
boo as the most diverse of natural origin in
both periods. Although artificial and bamboo
exhibited the same diversity during the dry
period, bamboo showed higher diversity and
uniformity in the data (Table 1). The CDC trap
exhibited the highest diversity during the rainy
season. However, both traps displayed similar
diversity levels during the dry period (Table 2).
According to the rarefaction curves sam-
pling sufficiency was not reached since the
cumulative number of species did not reach
an asymptote at the end of both collection
periods (Fig. 2). However, ACE and Chao 1
non-parametric estimators reached 100 % cov-
erage in the dry period (Table 2), and Chao 1
reached 100 % coverage during the rainy period
(Table 3). Although species richness was higher
during the rainy period, confidence intervals
of both periods are overlapping, meaning they
do not differ significantly (Colwell et al., 2004).
Non-parametric estimators suggested that
the estimated richness was: 8.01 ± 1.31 species
for the dry period and 13.87 ± 2.57 species for
the rainy period. The sampling effort recorded
most of the richness since sampling complete-
ness exceeded 75 % (Table 3) in both periods.
Tabl e 2
Abundance and diversity of adult species by trap and collection period.
Trap SpeciesaAbundance Sbexp(H)c1/DddeJf
DRY PERIOD 12 4 4 3 0.42 0.91
CDC Culex (Cux.) sp. 1 2 3 3 3 0.4 0.96
Wyeomyia (Dec.) ulocoma 1
Psorophora (Gra.) dimidiata 2
Shannon Culex (Cux.) sp. 1 1 3 3 3 0.43 0.91
Culex (Cux.) sp. 2 3
Psorophora (Gra.) dimidiata 3
RAINY PERIOD 49 5 3 2 0.61 0.73
CDC Culex (Mel.) dunni 3 5 4 4 0.4 0.91
Culex (Cux.) sp. 2 3
Culex (Cux.) sp. 3 1
Psorophora (Gra.) dimidiata 6
Psorophora (Jan.) ferox 2
Shannon Culex (Mel.) dunni 4 4 2 2 0.71 0.66
Culex (Cux.) sp. 3 2
Psorophora (Gra.) dimidiata 24
Psorophora (Jan.) ferox 4
a: subgenera: (Dec.) Decamyia Dyar, (Cux.) Culex Linnaeus, (Mel.) Melanoconion Theobald, (Gra.) Grabhamia Theobald,
(Jan.) Janthinosoma Lynch Arribálzaga. b: richness (0D); c: Shannon diversity index (1D); d: Simpsons diversity index (2D);
e: Berger-Parker dominance index; f: Pielou’s equality index.
7
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
Cluster analysis produced well-supported
branches with a high cophenetic correlation of
0.99 (Fig. 3). Two groups of larval habitats were
formed based on their taxonomic composition:
1) Calathea sp. and Heliconia spp. inflorescenc-
es, 2) artificial and Bamboo cavities.
ANOSIM indicated no significant differ-
ences in taxonomic composition of the breed-
ing sites between the dry and rainy periods
(R = -0.115, P > 0.05). The negative value of R
suggested greater dissimilarity within periods
than between them (Chapman & Underwood,
1999). In other words, the taxonomic composi-
tion differs between larval habitat types rather
than between periods.
DISCUSSION
No previous studies have been conduct-
ed on mosquito diversity and distribution
Fig. 2. Accumulation curves of immatures per sample. Dashed lines show their confidence interval bounds for each period.
Tabl e 3
Observed and expected number of immature species from
both periods.
Non-parametric estimators
of richness
Periods
Dry Rainy
ACE 7 13
Chao1 7 11.33
Jack1 9.75 17.42
Bootstrap 8.3 13.73
Observed species 7 11
Meana8.01 13.87
SDb1.31 2.57
%c87.36 79.31
a: mean of the estimated richness among the 4 non-
parametric estimators; b: standard deviation; c: measure of
sampling completeness = observed species divided / mean
of the estimators * 100.
Fig. 3. Cluster analysis (UPGMA) dendrogram of larval
habitats in the dry and rainy periods, based on the Bray-
Curtis distance matrix.
8Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
of breeding sites in urban parks in Ecuador.
PALI shares a similar species richness to Chico
Mendes Ecological Park and Carmo Park in
São Paulo, Brazil (Bicudo de Paula et al., 2015).
The three parks are similar in size, but the
parks in Brazil had a higher abundance of
individuals due to the longer collection period
and greater availability of breeding sites. This
highlighted the richness found in PALI since a
similar number of species were found for fewer
individuals sampled.
During the rainy period almost twice as
many immature individuals and a slightly high-
er species richness were recorded, although
not enough to be significantly different from
the dry period. Nevertheless, diversity was
slightly higher during the dry period due to
the disproportionate increase of Wy. ulocoma
immatures and Ps. dimidiata adults during the
rainy period.
Although ACE and Chao1 estimators
resulted in 100 % sampling completeness, and
the mean sampling completeness exceeded 75
%, the rarefaction curves did not reach sam-
pling sufficiency. The literature states that in
invertebrate studies, such as arthropods, mainly
in tropical areas, asymptotes may never be
reached because these are taxon-rich groups
(Gotelli & Colwell, 2001).
The Calathea sp. and tree hole patch
occurred once. Consequently, Wy. celaeno-
cephala (Dyar & Knab, 1906) was only found
in that single patch. For aesthetic reasons, the
park is constantly being landscaped, cleared,
and cleaned; therefore, the Calathea sp. patch
was removed, and the bromeliad patches were
reduced after the dry period. In other words,
there is a strong human influence on the envi-
ronment, which certainly modifies the distri-
bution patterns of species. And, regarding the
availability of breeding sites between periods,
it is premature to conclude that it was the same
since anthropogenic activity played a signifi-
cant role. However, the occurrence of the tree
hole patch during the rainy season may be due
to a meteorological factor.
The species in this study were mostly
specialized in a specific larval habitat type,
except for Wy. Ulocoma and Cx. urichii. In fact,
the cluster analysis revealed two groups with
shared species: 1) inflorescences of Calathea sp.
and Heliconia spp. with Wy. ulocoma, although
the disproportionate abundance of Wy. ulo-
coma in Heliconia generated low similarity; 2)
artificial and Bamboo cavities with Cx. urichii.
However, the tree hole, ponds, and bromeliads
had distinct compositions and did not colonize
other habitat types.
Wyeomyia ulocoma, Wy. medioalbipes,
Wyeomyia felicia (Dyar & Nuñez Tovar, 1927),
Culex imitator (Theobald, 1903), Culex dolo-
sus (Lynch Arribálzaga, 1891), Culex secundus
(Bonne-Wepster & Bonne, 1920) were found
as established in the literature (Chaverri et al.,
2018; Frank & Curtis, 1981; Lane & Cerqueira,
1942; Medeiros-Sousa et al., 2015; Navarro et
al., 2007; Valencia, 1973).
Wyeomyia celaenocephala was found in a
tree hole, which has not been described as a
breeding site for this species in particular, but
for its subgenus (Frank & Curtis, 1981; Lane &
Cerqueira, 1942; Navarro et al., 2015). Likewise,
Wyeomyia melanopus (Dyar, 1919) was found
in bamboo stumps, a larval habitat not previ-
ously reported for this species, although it has
been for other members of the subgenus (Lane,
1953b; Lane & Cerqueira, 1942).
Culex urichii was found in bamboo stumps
and artificial containers. This aligns with lit-
erature describing the species in a wide vari-
ety of larval habitats (Feijó Almeida et al.,
2020; Liria & Navarro, 2003). Records of Cx.
urichii have been found in the husks of white
cacao (Theobroma grandiflorum) (Berti et al.,
2013) and bacao (Theobroma bicolor) (Booth,
2018). While both Theobroma species have
been described in Ecuador (Duque et al., 2019;
Ponce et al., 2021), there are no records linking
them to Culicidae.
Culex dunni (Dyar, 1918) and Cx. derivator
(Dyar & Knab, 1906) were only found during
the rainy period in the “moretal, a swampy and
permanently flooded area typical of the Ama-
zon region, characterized by the predominant
growth of the morete palm tree (Mauritia flex-
uosa). Supporting the description of Cx. dunni
9
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
being collected from natural ponds (Bang-
her, 2020), and subgenus Neoculex inhabiting
groundwater bodies (Harbach, 2009).
Toxorhynchites theobaldi (Dyar &
Knab,1906) was found in a bamboo stump,
indicating its presence in natural larval habitats.
However, it has also been documented in tires,
plastic, and glass containers (Ceretti-Junior et
al., 2016). Toxorhynchites is a genus of great
interest in biological control studies, because
are predators of other immature species, and as
adults are not hematophagous.
Limatus durhamii (Theobald, 1901) was
found in artificial containers, but there are
records of the species in natural breeding sites
as well (Chaverri et al., 2018; Feijó Almeida et
al., 2020; Navarro et al., 2007) and has been
found with a high rate of prevalence in artificial
larval habitats along with Aedes (Talaga, 2016).
Toxorhynchites theobaldi and Li. durhamii
are ecological regulators of immatures popu-
lations and their predator efficiency in PALI
is unknown. Therefore, it is not ruled out
that both species may have contributed to
the occurrence of rare and occasional species
(low abundance).
Psorophora ferox (von Humboldt, 1819)
and Ps. dimidiata were only collected by CDC
and Shannon traps. Psorophora lay their eggs
on damp or dry mud where they withstand
long periods (months or years) of desiccation
and hatch when the habitat is inundated by
rain or flood waters (Foster & Walker, 2019).
This could potentially explain the higher abun-
dance of both Psorophora species during the
rainy period.
There is medical importance associated
with a few species in PALI. Several strains of
Ilheus and Venezuelan encephalitis viruses have
been isolated from Wy. medioalbipes (Wilker-
son et al., 2021), but little is known about its
medical importance. In Ecuador, the species
may be of interest because it was described in
Ananas comosus (Navarro et al., 2018), there-
fore crops can serve as large reservoirs. In fact,
Wyeomyia is considered to be underestimated
since several pathogens have been recovered
from or experimentally passed through species
of the genus (Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit,
2023). However, due to problematical identifi-
cation, there has been no arboviral surveillance.
Limatus durhamii is recognized as a vector of
VEE virus, Caraparu virus, and Guama virus
(Feijó Almeida et al., 2020; Navarro et al.,
2015). Psorophora ferox is a vector for Ilheus
virus and VEE virus. Also, West Nile virus
and Cache, Oriboca, and St Louis encephalitis
viruses have been isolated from this species
(Wilkerson et al., 2015). Finally, Culex dunni
has been reported as a vector of Venezuelan
Equine Encephalitis (VEE) (Berti et al., 2013).
Some mosquitoes are known to be able to
travel long distances, usually with the help of air
currents. In the spread of the Japanese encepha-
litis virus to Australia, a significant role was
played by wind dispersal (Ritchie & Rochester,
2001). Also, in parts of Africa, where surface
water is absent for months, malaria persistence
is associated with windborne long-distance
migration of mosquitoes (Huestis et al., 2019).
Mosquitoes may be able to cross the river,
but it will depend on their flight capacity. Mos-
quitoes generally have a reduced flight range as
wind velocity increases (Verdonschot & Besse-
Lototskaya, 2014). In general, the flight capacity
of Culicidae remains unknown and is likely to
vary among species. Information is only avail-
able for one of the species recorded in PALI,
Ps. ferox, which has excellent dispersal ability
(2 500 m of average maximum flight distance),
stronger than the most common urban vector
species, Aedes aegypti and Ae. albopictus (333
and 676 m, respectively) (Verdonschot & Besse-
Lototskaya, 2014).
Psorophora ferox as a vector species could
be of concern, as it is more likely to colonize the
surroundings of the park than domestic species.
But it is known that the migration process is
far more complex because it depends not only
on flight capacity but also on the prevalence of
the species, which is influenced by factors such
as the availability of breeding sites and com-
munity dynamics. For instance, although urban
vector species like Ae. aegypti and Ae. albopictus
have been observed in urban parks in Brazil
(Ceretti-Junior et al., 2016; Medeiros-Sousa et
10 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
al., 2015) it is known that under natural condi-
tions, high abundances of Li. durhamii have
been observed to lead to competitive exclusion
of Ae. aegypti in less disturbed larval habitats
(Talaga, 2016).
However, migration from the park to
the peri-urban area is not ruled out, particu-
larly for species (Tx. theobaldi, Li. durhamii,
Cx. secundus, Cx. derivator, Cx. dolosus) with
broad distributions and adaptability to dis-
turbed environments. Furthermore, proximity
and environmental degradation may accelerate
species migration and lead to epizootic cycles.
Vertebrates in PALI (monkeys, bats, rodents,
others) contribute to the epidemiological risk.
Over time, the park could host more animal
populations, potentially maintaining enzootic
transmission cycles and even leading to epizo-
otic cycles, that may introduce pathogens into
the urban ecosystem. In addition, Hendy et
al. (2020) have concluded that the community
composition between forest edge and interior
sites changes, with a gradual decrease in the
abundance of certain species further into the
forest. Studies have also concluded that the
diversity and abundance of species varies with
distance between the ground and the canopy,
and that these metrics are concentrated in the
lower stratum (Confalonieri & Costa Neto,
2012; Tantely et al., 2019). In other words, arbo-
virus exchange between humans and wildlife
can vary significantly within meters, and that
the role of species as possible bridge vectors is
likely defined around forest fragments.
Most of the species described have already
been reported in Ecuador. However, there is no
detailed record of the distribution of Wy. mela-
nopus and Cx. dolosus in the country (Angulo &
Olivares, 1993). This may be the first confirmed
report of Wy. celaenocephala, and Tx. theobaldi
in the Ecuadorian Amazon region, and the
first record of Wy. felicia and Cx. derivator for
the country, as no records were found after the
literature review.
The increase in abundance, including epi-
demiologically important species (Cx. dunni,
Ps. ferox) during the rainy period, warns about
the risk of pathogen transmission. Therefore,
since rainfall is bimodal, preventive recommen-
dations should be provided to visitors, mainly
during periods of high rainfall. Although sea-
sonality was evaluated in this study, precipita-
tion in Tena exceeds 4 000 mm/year, with no
months has less than 100 mm (Lucas-Solis et
al., 2021), meaning the dry period refers to a
period of relatively low precipitation. This may
explain why no significant differences were
found between seasons, besides abundance.
Ethical statement: the authors declare that
they all agree with this publication and made
significant contributions; that there is no con-
flict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are fully
and clearly stated in the acknowledgments sec-
tion. A signed document has been filed in the
journal archives.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
To Marcelo Carrera, Lizeth Sabando,
Bryan Coronel, Karla Verdugo and Evelyn Oña
for field support. We thank the AECID project
PAO-002-2019 “Eco-epidemiology, citizen sci-
ence and diversity of insects of medical-vet-
erinary importance in the urban area of Tena,
Napo Province” for the funding granted. We
thank the AECID project POA-002-2019 for
partially financing this research.
REFERENCES
Angulo, A. O., & Olivares, T. S. (1993). Catálogo de los
culícidos de Chile (Díptera Culicidae) y dos especies
nuevas de Culex (Culex) Linnaeus. Boletín de la Socie-
dad de Biología de Concepción, 64, 21–26.
Bangher, D. N. (2020). Revisión Sistemática de Culex
(Melanoconion) Theobald (Diptera: Culicidae) en
Argentina (Tesis doctoral). Universidad Nacional del
Nordeste, Argentina. http://repositorio.unne.edu.ar/
handle/123456789/27738
Berti, J., Guzmán, H., Estrada, Y., Pérez, E., Ramírez, R.,
Sánchez, V., González, J., & Guerra, L. A. (2013). Pri-
mer registro de Culex (Carrollia) anduzei Cerqueira
& Lane, 1944 en Venezuela y Culex (Melanoconion)
dunni Dyar, 1918 en el estado Bolívar. Boletín de
Malariología y Salud Ambiental, 53(2), 202–208.
11
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
Bicudo de Paula, M., Fernandes, A., Medeiros-Sousa, A. R.,
Ceretti-Júnior, W., Christe, R., Stroebel, R. C., Pedro-
sa, L., Marques de Sá Almeida, R. M., de Carvalho, G.
C., Pereira, U. D., de Oliveira Jacintho, M. C., Natal,
D., & Toledo Marrelli, M. (2015). Mosquito (Diptera:
Culicidae) fauna in parks in greater São Paulo, Bra-
zil. Biota Neotropica, 15(3), e20140026. https://doi.
org/10.1590/1676-0611-bn-2014-0026
Booth, M. (2018). Climate change and the neglected tropi-
cal diseases. In D. Rollinson, & J. R. Stothard (Eds.),
Advances in Parasitology (pp. 39–126). Academic
Press. https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.apar.2018.02.001
Bueno-Marí, R., Almeida, A. P. G., & Navarro, J. C. (2015).
Emerging zoonoses: eco-epidemiology, involved mecha-
nisms and public health implications. Frontiers in Public
Health. https://doi.org/10.3389/978-2-88919-618-0
Ceretti-Junior, W., de Oliveira Christe, R., Rizzo, M., Stro-
bel, R. C., de Matos Junior, M. O., de Mello, M. H. S.
H., Fernandes, A., Medeiros-Sousa, A. R., de Carval-
ho, G. C., & Marrelli, M. T. (2016). Species composi-
tion and ecological aspects of immature mosquitoes
(Diptera: Culicidae) in Bromeliads in urban parks
in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Journal of Arthropod-
Borne Diseases, 10(1), 102–112.
Chapman, M., & Underwood, A. (1999). Ecological pat-
terns in multivariate assemblages: information and
interpretation of negative values in ANOSIM tests.
Marine Ecology Progress Series, 180, 257–265.
Chaverri, L. G., Dillenbeck, C., Lewis, D., Rivera, C., Rome-
ro, L. M., & Chaves, L. F. (2018). Mosquito species
(Diptera: Culicidae) diversity from ovitraps in a
Mesoamerican Tropical Rainforest. Journal of Medical
Entomology, 55(3), 646–653. https://doi.org/10.1093/
jme/tjx254
Clarke, K. R. (1993). Non-parametric multivariate analy-
ses of changes in community structure. Austra-
lian Journal of Ecology, 18, 117–143. https://doi.
org/10.1111/j.1442-9993.1993.tb00438.x
Colwell, R. K. (2022). EstimateS: Statistical estimation of
species richness and shared species from samples (Ver-
sion 9.1, Software). https://www.robertkcolwell.org/
pages/estimates
Colwell, R. K., Mao, C. X., & Chang, J. (2004). Interpola-
ting, extrapolating, and comparing incidence-based
species accumulation curves. Ecology, 85(10), 2717–
2727. https://doi.org/10.1890/03-0557
Confalonieri, U. E. C., & Costa Neto, C. (2012). Diver-
sity of mosquito vectors (Diptera: Culicidae) in
Caxiuanã, Pará, Brazil. Interdisciplinary Perspecti-
ves on Infectious Diseases, 2012, 741273. https://doi.
org/10.1155/2012/741273
Duque, P. L., Liria, J., Enríquez, S., Burgaleta, E., Salazar,
J., Arrivillaga-Henríquez, J., & Navarro, J. C. (2019).
High mosquito diversity in an Amazonian village of
Ecuador, surrounded by a Biological Reserve, using
a rapid assessment method. Journal of Entomological
and Acarological Research, 51(1), 7775. https://doi.
org/10.4081/jear.2019.7775
Feijó Almeida, J., Matos Belchior, H. C., Ríos-Velásquez, C.
M., & Costa Pessoa, F. A. (2020). Diversity of mosqui-
toes (Diptera: Culicidae) collected in different types
of larvitraps in an Amazon rural settlement. PLOS
ONE, 15(10), e0235726. https://doi.org/10.1371/jour-
nal.pone.0235726
Forattini, O. P. (1965). Entomología Médica: Culicini: Culex,
Aedes e Psorophora. Universidade de São Paulo,
Brasil.
Foster, W. A., & Walker, E. D. (2019). Mosquitoes (Culicidae).
In G. R. Mullen, & L. A. Durden (Eds.), Medical and
veterinary entomology (pp. 261–325). Academic Press.
https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-814043-7.00015-7
Frank, J. H., & Curtis, G. A. (1981). On the bionomics of
bromeliad-inhabiting mosquitoes. VI. A review of the
bromeliad-inhabiting species. Journal of the Florida
Anti-Mosquito Association, 52, 4–23.
González, R., & Darsie Jr., R. F. (1996). Clave ilustrada para
la determinación genérica de larvas de Culicidae de
Colombia y el Nuevo Mundo. Boletín del Museo de
Entomología de la Universidad del Valle, 4(1), 21–37.
Gotelli, N. J., & Colwell, R. K. (2001). Quantifying biodi-
versity: procedures and pitfalls in the measurement
and comparison of species richness. Ecology Letters,
4(4), 379–391.
Hammer, Ø. (2022). Paleontological Statistics (Version 4.09,
Software). https://www.nhm.uio.no/english/research/
infrastructure/past/
Harbach, R. E. (2009). Mosquito Taxonomic Inventory.
https://mosquito-taxonomic-inventory.myspecies.
info/subgenus-emneoculexem-dyar-1905
Harbach, R. E., & Wilkerson, R. C. (2023). The insuppor-
table validity of mosquito subspecies (Diptera: Culi-
cidae) and their exclusion from culicid classification.
Zootaxa, 5303(1), 1–184. https://doi.org/10.11646/
zootaxa.5303.1.1
Hendy, A., Hernandez-Acosta, E., Chaves, B. A., Ferreira Fé,
N., Valério, D., Mendonça, C., de Lacerda, M. V. G.,
Buenemann, M., Vasilakis, N., & Hanley, K. A. (2020).
Into the woods: Changes in mosquito community
composition and presence of key vectors at increasing
distances from the urban edge in urban forest parks in
Manaus, Brazil. Acta Tropica, 206, 105441. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.actatropica.2020.105441
Huestis, D. L., Dao, A., Diallo, M., Sanogo, Z. L., Samake,
D., Yaro, A. S., Ousman, Y., Linton, Y. M., Krishna, A.,
Veru, L., Krajacich, B. J., Faiman, R., Florio, J., Chap-
man, J. W., Reynolds, D. R., Weetman, D., Mitchell, R.,
Donnelly, M. J., Talamas, E., … Lehmann, T. (2019).
12 Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075 Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
Windborne long-distance migration of malaria mos-
quitoes in the Sahel. Nature, 574, 404–408. https://doi.
org/10.1038/s41586-019-1622-4
Jost, L., & González-Oreja, A. (2012). Midiendo la diversi-
dad biológica: más allá del índice de Shannon. Acta
Zoológica Lilloana, 56(1-2), 3–14.
Lane, J. (1953a). Neotropical Culicidae: Dixinae, Chaobori-
nae and Culicinae, tribes Anophelini, Toxorhynchitini
and Culicini (Genus Culex only) (Vol. I). University
of São Paulo.
Lane, J. (1953b). Neotropical Culicidae: Tribe Culicini, Dei-
nocerites, Uranotaenia, Mansonia, Orthopodomyia,
Aedomyia, Aedes, Psorophora, Haemagogus, Tribe
Sabethini, Trichoprosopon, Wyeomyia, Phoniomyia,
Limatus, and Sabethes (Vol. II.). University of São
Paulo.
Lane, J. & Cerqueira, N. L. (1942). Os sabetineos da Ame-
rica (Diptera, Culicidae). Archivos de Zoologia do
Estado de São Paulo, 3(9), 473–692.
Lira-Vieira, A. R., Gurgel-Gonçalves, R., Moreira, I. M.,
Yoshizawa, M. A. C., Coutinho, M. L., Prado, P. S.,
de Souza, J. L., Chaib, A. J. M., Moreira, J. S., & de
Castro, C. N. (2013). Ecological aspects of mosquitoes
(Diptera: Culicidae) in the gallery forest of Brasília
National Park, Brazil, with an emphasis on potential
vectors of yellow fever. Revista Da Sociedade Brasileira
de Medicina Tropical, 46(5), 566–574.
Liria, J., & Navarro, J. C. (2003). Morphology of the larval
mandible and maxilla in the subgenus Carrollia Lutz
of Culex L. (Diptera: Culicidae). Zootaxa, 186(1), 1–8.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.186.1.1
Lucas-Solis, O., Moulatlet, G. M., Guamangallo, J., Yacelga,
N., Villegas, L., Galarza, E., Rosero, B., Zurita, B.,
Sabando, L., Cabrera, M., Gimiliani, G. T., & Cappa-
relli, M. V. (2021). Preliminary assessment of plastic
litter and microplastic contamination in freshwater
depositional areas: The case study of Puerto Misahua-
lli, Ecuadorian Amazonia. Bulletin of Environmental
Contamination and Toxicology, 107(1), 45–51. https://
doi.org/10.1007/s00128-021-03138-2
Medeiros-Sousa, A. R., Ceretti-Júnior, W., de Carvalho,
G. C., Nardi, M. S., Araujo, A. B., Vendrami, D. P.,
& Marrelli, M. T. (2015). Diversity and abundan-
ce of mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in an urban
park: Larval habitats and temporal variation. Acta
Tropica, 150, 200–209. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
actatropica.2015.08.002
Microsoft Corporation. (2016). Microsoft Excel (Software).
https://office.microsoft.com/excel
Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. (2020). Gaceta
epidemiológica. Ecuador, SE 01-52-2019. https://www.
salud.gob.ec/gacetas-vectoriales-2019/
Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. (2021). Gaceta
epidemiológica. Ecuador, SE 01-53-2020. https://www.
salud.gob.ec/gacetas-vectoriales-2020/
Ministerio de Salud Pública del Ecuador. (2022). Gaceta
epidemiológica. Ecuador, SE 01-52-2021. https://www.
salud.gob.ec/gacetas-vectoriales-2021/
Navarro, J. C., Arrivillaga, J., Morales, D., Ponce, P., & Ceva-
llos, V. (2015). Evaluación rápida de biodiversidad
de mosquitos (Diptera: Culicidae) y riesgo en salud
ambiental en un área montana del chocó ecuatoriano.
Entomotropica, 30(16), 160–173.
Navarro, J. C., Duque, P. L., Liria, J., Enríquez, S., Vaca-
Moyano, F., & Salazar, J. G. (2018). A new phytotelm
plant for Ecuador, Ananas comosus L. Merr. (Brome-
liaceae) a its Wyeomyia species inhabitant (Diptera,
Culicidae). Revista CienciAmérica, 7(2), 1–16. https://
doi.org/10.33210/ca.v7i2.182
Navarro, J. C., Liria, J., Piñango, H., & Barrera, R. (2007).
Biogeographic area relationships in Venezuela: A
parsimony analysis of Culicidae-Phytotelmata dis-
tribution in National Parks. Zootaxa, 1547(1), 1–19.
https://doi.org/10.11646/zootaxa.1547.1.1
OPS/OMS. (2020). Epidemiological Update: Dengue in
the context of Covid-19. https://iris.paho.org/
handle/10665.2/52288
Ponce, P., Cevallos, V., & Carrazco Montalvo, A. (2021).
Mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) of Ecuador: A revi-
sed checklist, new records and species of medical
importance. BioRxiv. https://doi.org/https://doi.
org/10.1101/2021.02.10.429771
Ramón, G. M., Pérez, R., & Jarrín, P. (2019). Francis-
co Campos-Rivadeneira and Roberto Levi-Castillo:
Their lives and contributions to the study of mos-
quitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in Ecuador. Biomedica,
39(3), 172–198. https://doi.org/10.7705/biomedica.
v39i3.4415
Ritchie, S. A., & Rochester, W. (2001). Wind-blown mos-
quitoes and introduction of Japanese encephalitis into
Australia. Emerging Infectious Diseases, 7(5), 900–903.
https://doi.org/10.3201/eid0705.017524
Sallum Mureb, M. A., & Forattini, O. P. (1996). Revision of
the spissipes section of Culex (Melanoconion) (Dip-
tera: Culicidae). Journal of the American Mosquito
Control Association, 12(3), 517–600.
Silver, J. B. (2008). Sampling adults with non-attractant
traps. In J. B. Silver. Mosquito Ecology, Field Sam-
pling Methods (pp. 771–844). Springer. https://doi.
org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6666-5_8
Talaga, S. (2016). Ecologie, diversité et évolution des mousti-
ques (Diptera: Culicidae) de Guyane française: impli-
cations dans l’invasion biologique du moustique Aedes
aegypti (L.), Thèse de doctorat, Université de Guyane,
Guyana. https://tel.archives-ouvertes.fr/tel-01405425
13
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN: 2215-2075, Vol. 71: e55184, enero-diciembre 2023 (Publicado Oct. 30, 2023)
Tantely, L. M., Randrianambinintsoa, F. J., Woog, F., Raha-
rinirina, M. R., Ratsimbazafy, J., Boyer, S., & Girod,
R. (2019). Horizontal and vertical distribution of
mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in the rainforest of
Maromizaha, Madagascar: Implications for patho-
gen transmission to humans and animals. Austral
Entomology, 58(4), 897–906. https://doi.org/10.1111/
aen.12427
Urbinatti, P. R., Sendacz, S., & Natal, D. (2001). Immature
mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in a public city park.
Revista de Saude Publica, 35(5), 461–466. https://doi.
org/10.1590/s0034-89102001000500009
Valencia, J. D. (1973). Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culici-
dae): A revision of the subgenus Carrollia of Culex.
Contributions of the American Entomological Institute,
9(4), 1–134.
Verdonschot, P. F. M., & Besse-Lototskaya, A. A. (2014).
Flight distance of mosquitoes (Culicidae): A metadata
analysis to support the management of barrier zones
around rewetted and newly constructed wetlands.
Limnologica, 45, 69–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
limno.2013.11.002
Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit. (2021). Identification
Keys. https://www.wrbu.si.edu/vectorspecies/keys
Walter Reed Biosystematics Unit. (2023). Wyeomyia Theo-
bald, 1901. https://www.wrbu.si.edu/vectorspecies/
genera/wyeomyia
Wilkerson, R. C., Linton, Y. M., Fonseca, D. M., Schultz, T.
R., Price, D. C., & Strickman, D. A. (2015). Making
mosquito taxonomy useful: A stable classification
of tribe Aedini that balances utility with current
knowledge of evolutionary relationships. PLoS ONE,
10(7), e0133602. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.
pone.0133602
Wilkerson, R. C., Linton, Y. M., & Strickman, D. (2021).
Mosquitoes of the World. Johns Hopkins University
Press.
Zavortink, T. J. (1972). Mosquito studies (Diptera, Culi-
cidae): The New World species formerly placed in
Aedes (Finlaya). Contributions of the American Ento-
mological Institute, 8(3), 1–205.