202
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Reproduction of the sea urchin Tripneustes depressus (Camarodonta:
Toxopneustidae) in Bahía de La Paz, Baja California Sur, Mexico
Ailet Vives
1
Tamara Rubilar
2,3
María Dinorah Herrero-Pérezrul
1
Bertha Patricia Ceballos-Vázquez
1
*
1. Instituto Politécnico Nacional, Centro Interdisciplinario de Ciencias Marinas, Av. Instituto Politécnico Nacional s/n,
Playa Palo de Santa Rita, La Paz, Baja California Sur, México; ailetvives@gmail.com, dherrero@ipn.mx,
bceballo@ipn.mx (*Correspondence).
2. Laboratorio de Química de Organismos Marinos, Instituto Patagónico del Mar. Facultad de Ciencias Naturales y
Ciencias de la Salud. Universidad Nacional de la Patagonia San Juan Bosco. Bvld. Brown, Puerto Madryn, Chubut,
Argentina; tamararubilar@gmail.com
3. Laboratorio de Oceanografía Biológica, Centro para el Estudio de Sistemas Marinos. Bvld. Brown, Puerto Madryn,
Argentina; tamararubilar@gmail.com
Received 30-VI-2020. Corrected 25-X-2020. Accepted 06-XI-2020.
ABSTRACT
Introduction: Sea urchin gonads (roe or uni) are considered a culinary delicacy worldwide. However, only
a few species are considered edible and commercialized. The sea urchin Tripneustes depressus has generated
the interest of producers in Baja California Sur, Mexico, due to the quality of its gonads. A biological basis
for designing a management strategy is key to consider its commercial exploitation. Objective: To determine
the reproductive season of T. depressus through description of the gonad stages and reproductive cycle, and
to establish its relationship with environmental factors. Methods: We collected monthly samples (October
2016-September 2017), recording in-situ temperature and photoperiod. We evaluated a sample of 1 055 speci-
mens for demographic characteristics, using total weight (g) and test diameter (cm). We also did a histological
analysis of gonads from 178 individuals. Results: Average test diameter was 9.70 ± 0.03 cm (5-12.50 cm). Based
on the proportion into the gonad of sexual (gametes) and somatic (nutritive phagocytes) cells, we propose five
gonad stages (growing, premature, mature, spawning, and intergametic) for both sexes. There were two times
of the year when gonads were heaviest and closely corresponded to the growing stage, coinciding with the
highest proportions of nutritive phagocytes. Gonad development (growing and premature stages) peaks in the
months with the longest daylight periods, with spawning in the shortest daylight periods. Conclusions: Gonad
wet weight and adjusted gonad weight are good indicators of the reproductive season of T. depressus. The low-
est gonad wet weights were matched the spawning peak in the shortest daylight period (January and March).
Key words: reproductive season; adjusted gonad weights; gonadal stages; urchin roe; Echinoidea.
Vives, A., Rubilar, T., Herrero-Pérezrul, M.D., &
Ceballos-Vázquez, B.P. (2021). Reproduction of
the sea urchin Tripneustes depressus (Camarodonta:
Toxopneustidae) in Bahía de La Paz, Baja California
Sur, Mexico. Revista de Biología Tropical, 69(S1),
202-218. DOI 10.15517/rbt.v69iSuppl.1.46353
Sea urchins are ecologically important
due to their major impact on community struc-
ture and dynamics in shallow subtidal zones
(Harrold & Pearse, 1987; Toro-Farmer, Can-
tera, Londono-Cruz, Orozco, & Neira, 2004).
In addition, their gonads are consumed as
food, making of sea urchins a valuable fishery
resource (Montealegre & Gómez, 2005; Law-
rence, 2007).
Knowledge about the reproductive cycle
of sea urchins is key for understanding their
life history. Sea urchin gonads contain not only
DOI 10.15517/rbt.v69iSuppl.1.46353
203
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
reproductive cells, but also nutritive phago-
cytes, thus serving also as nutrient storage
organs (Walker, 1982; Unuma, 2002; Walker,
Lesser, & Unuma, 2013; Unuma, Murata,
Hasegawa, Sawaguchi, & Takahashi, 2015).
This makes the gametogenic cycle more com-
plex; the cycle begins with fully developed
nutritive phagocytes and changes in the epi-
thelium and germ cells, which differentiate
into male and female gametes that then ripe
until being released along with the decrease of
nutritive phagocytes (Walker, Unuma, & Less-
er, 2007), showing an alternating abundance
of the somatic and reproductive cell types.
Besides, factors such as temperature, photo-
period, hydrodynamics, food availability, and
diet composition influence the reproductive
cycle and development of echinoids (Ridder &
Lawrence, 1982; McBride, Pinnix, Lawrence,
Lawrence, & Mulligan, 1997; Fernandez &
Pergent, 1998; Spirlet, Grosjean, & Jangoux,
2000; Vaitilingon, Rasolofonirina, & Jangoux,
2005; Lawrence, 2007).
Currently, only two sea urchin species
are commercially exploited in Mexico, Meso-
centrotus franciscanus (=Strongylocentrotus
franciscanus) (red sea urchin) and Strongy-
locentrotus purpuratus (Pacific purple sea
urchin), both restricted to Baja California. In
Baja California Sur, Tripneustes depressus
is one of the most common sea urchins and
along with its large size and the fact that its
gonads have been recently rated as of good
quality (Vives, 2018), generating the inter-
est of local fishing cooperatives to market it.
However, it is necessary at least to generate
biological information and made an appropri-
ate population analysis base and a management
strategy before thinking about the commercial
exploitation of T. depressus, in fact it would
be more appropriate to think about developing
its aquaculture. In this sense, the objective of
our study is to generate biological knowledge
of T. depressus determining its reproductive
season through description of the gonad stages
and the reproductive cycle, besides establish
its relationship with environmental factors, and
to provide information on some demographic
characteristics in a natural population from the
southwestern part of Bahía de la Paz.
MATERIALS AND METHODS
Specimen collection: Monthly samplings
were carried out from October 2016 to Sep-
tember 2017 at El Tecolote beach (Fig. 1), in
the southwestern part of Bahía de la Paz, Baja
California Sur State, Mexico (24°20’9” N &
110°13’48” W). Samples were collected at 1-5
m depth, according to the known distribution
of T. depressus in the study area. Temperature
(°C) was measured in situ at the time of collec-
tion with a mercury thermometer; photoperiod
data for the study period were obtained from
Timeanddate (2017).
Sample processing: To evaluate demo-
graphic characteristics based on average test
diameter and total body weight, between 80
and 100 specimens from all size classes (5-12.5
cm in test diameter) found in each monthly
sample were measured with a vernier caliper
and weighed with a digital scale, to the nearest
1 mm or 0.01 g, respectively.
To characterize the reproductive cycle,
15 specimens were randomly selected from
each monthly sample, except in January and
December; their gonads were excised and
weighed (to the nearest 0.0001 g), fixed in
Finefix for 48 hours, and preserved in 70 %
alcohol. Gonads were subsequently processed
using conventional histological techniques and
5 µm-thick sections were cut and stained with
haematoxylin-eosin (Humason, 1979). From
the histological analysis, specimens were first
sexed, since these did not show any apparent
differences either in external morphology or
gonad color to determine sex macroscopically.
Afterward, gonad stages were identified based
on the proportion of sexual cells (gametes)
and somatic phagocytic cells (nutritive phago-
cytes), using the scale proposed by Unuma et
al. (2015) modified for this species. Five stages
were considered: growing, premature, mature,
spawning, and intergametic. Histograms of
the monthly frequency of the different gonad
204
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
stages were plotted to identify the reproductive
cycle of this species.
The test diameter (D) and total body
weight (W) of specimens were used to calcu-
late a condition index (CI) using the following
formula: CI = W*100/D
b
. The gonad index
(GI) of each specimen was calculated as the
percentage ratio of gonad wet weight to total
body weight (Meidel & Scheibling, 1998);
these values were used to assess the potential
use of the index as an indicator of reproductive
activity in this species (Sánchez-España, Mar-
tínez-Pita, & García, 2004). Additionally, due
to the proven allometric relationship between
gonad wet weight and test diameter in sea
urchins (Ebert, Hernandez, & Russell, 2011),
a temporal pattern of the gonad cycle was
evaluated testing the average gonad wet weight
(AGW) as described below.
Statistical analyses: A temporal pattern of
the gonad cycle was evaluated by using a GLM
two-way ANCOVA, with test diameter as the
covariate and sex and months as factors; with
this, it was possible to determine (eliminating
the effect of the body size), whether regressions
of the average gonad wet weight (AGW) for
each individual test diameter differed between
months and sexes (Packard & Boardman, 1999).
Since our data did not follow a normal distri-
bution (Sokal & Rohlf, 1995), non-parametric
tests were used for the analyses. The Kruskal-
Wallis method was used to test for differences
between sexes and between reproductive stages
in each of the variables examined. The Spear-
man’s rank correlation coefficient was used to
examine the correlation between test diameter
and total body weight, and between gonad wet
weights and the environmental variables. All
the analyses were carried out using the soft-
ware Statistica v.8.0; a significance level α =
0.05 was used for all tests.
RESULTS
Demographic characteristics: The results
from the 1 055 specimens sampled showed that
total body weight ranged from 72 to 912 g,
with a mean (± standard error) of 411.72 ± 4.25
g, median of 422 g, and mode of 445 g; 60 %
of specimens weighed between 318 and 516
Fig. 1. Location of the study area in Bahía de la Paz, Baja California Sur State, Mexico.
205
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
g. There were significant differences between
months (KW: H = 317.24, P < 0.0001) in
total body weight; the lightest specimens were
recorded in October and December and the
heaviest from April to September.
Test diameter ranged between 5 and 12.50
cm, with a mean (± standard error) of 9.79 ±
0.03 cm. Most specimens (52 %) had a test
diameter between 9 and 11 cm. The monthly
frequency distributions of test diameter were
unimodal (Fig. 2); the smallest specimens were
recorded from October to December.
A significant correlation (rs = 0.27,
P < 0.05) between test diameter and total
weight was detected. There were significantly
more females than males (0.7M:1.4F) in the
178specimen sample that was sexed (χ2 = 5.75,
P < 0.05). We found no significant differences
between males and females in test diameter,
total body weight, or CI (P > 0.05), Table 1.
Fig. 2. Monthly frequency distributions of test diameter (cm) of Tripneustes depressus
in Bahía de La Paz, BCS, Mexico (N = 1 055).
206
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Gonad description: The sea urchin
T. depressus, has five lobe-shaped gonads
attached internally to the test. Each gonad lobe
has an elongated shape pointed towards the
oral end and rounded towards the aboral end;
granular appearance that resembles a bunch of
grapes; color ranging from yellowish to brown-
ish; texture varying from flaccid to turgid.
Gonad female stages:
Growing stage: Higher proportion of nutri-
tive phagocytes than germ cells. The acini
showed previtellogenic oocytes towards the
periphery, while the rest of the acinus was filled
with nutritive phagocytes (Fig. 3A).
Premature stage: Pre-vitellogenic and
vitellogenic oocytes were present at the
Fig. 3. Gonad female stages of T. depressus from Bahía de La Paz, BCS, Mexico: A. Growing stage. B. Premature stage. C.
Mature stage. D. Spawning stage. E. Intergametic stage. NP: nutritive phagocytes. PO: previtellogenic oocytes. RO: residual
oocytes. VO: vitellogenic oocytes. Scale bar = 100 µm.
207
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
periphery of the acinus. Vitellogenic oocytes
started to appear within the acinus. Nutri-
tive phagocytes were still abundant, but some
empty spaces could be found (Fig. 3B).
Mature stage: Higher proportion of germ
cells than nutritive phagocytes. Vitellogenic
oocytes filled the center of the acinus, whereas
previtellogenic oocytes, when present, were
found in small amounts at the periphery. Nutri-
tive phagocytes were restricted to the periphery
of acini (Fig. 3C).
Spawning stage: Nutritive phagocytes
make a smaller proportion and with no nutri-
tional content. Partially empty acini may show
residual vitellogenic oocytes (Fig. 3D).
Intergametic stage: This stage represents
the recovery period before the next gametogen-
ic development. Acini are almost empty, show-
ing nutritive phagocytes and residual oocytes
undergoing resorption (Fig. 3E).
Gonad male stages:
Growing stage: Nutritive phagocytes
occurred in higher proportion than germ cells.
Spermatocytes and spermatogonia restricted to
the periphery of the acinus. Nutritive phago-
cytes filled the rest of the acinus (Fig. 4A).
Premature stage: Active spermatogenesis
was observed at the periphery of the acinus;
spermatozoa started accumulating at the center
of the acinus. Nutritive phagocytes remain
abundant, but some empty spaces appear
(Fig. 4B).
Mature stage: Spermatogenic cells were
evident in higher proportion than nutritive
phagocytes. Spermatozoa almost fill the acinus.
Spermatogenic development centers can be
found at the periphery of the acinus. Nutritive
phagocytes occurred in low proportion, restrict-
ed to the periphery of the acinus (Fig. 4C).
Spawning: Nutritive phagocytes occurred
in a small proportion and empty of nutri-
tional content. Partially empty acini contained
different quantities of spermatozoa in the
lumen (Fig. 4D).
Intergametic stage: This stage represents
the recovery period, prior to the onset of
gametogenic development. The acini mainly
contain nutritive phagocytes. Residual sper-
matozoa inside the acinus are undergoing
resorption (Fig. 4E).
Reproductive cycle: Fig. 5A shows the
frequency distribution of the gonad develop-
ment stages of both sexes combined over the
study period. The growing and intergametic
stages occurred for most of the year and cor-
responded to stages of reproductive inactivity
and recovery. Gamete development and growth
in this species seem to take place in two sea-
sons. The main season starts between April
and August and peaks in June; the second and
shorter season takes place from September to
December, peaking in October. Spawning takes
place between January and March, with a small
secondary event in August. The gonads enter
an intergametic stage after spawning and prior
to starting a new cycle; this stage was most
frequently seen from January to April.
Gonad weight and Gonad index: Both,
gonad wet weight (GWW) and adjusted gonad
weight (AGW) presented similar results
(Table 1). Both values were significantly higher
in males than females (KW: H = 11.779, P =
0.0006; GLM: F = 39.97, P < 0.0001). Monthly
variations of GWW and AGW followed a simi-
lar trend in both, males and females and also
displayed a similar seasonal variation (Fig. 5C,
5D) with significant different values among
months (KW: H = 122.22, P < 0.0001; GLM: F
= 47.73, P < 0.0001). In the same sense, males
showed gonad index values significantly higher
than females (KW: H = 14.274, P = 0.0002).
The highest GI values were recorded in Octo-
ber and December 2016, with high values also
recorded between May and September 2017;
the lowest values occurred from January to
March 2017 (Fig. 5B). The heaviest gonads
(both GWW and AGW) were found in two
periods, October-December 2016 and May-
September 2017, and the lightest, from Janu-
ary to March 2017 (Fig. 5C, 5D). However,
monthly variations followed a similar trend in
the two sexes.
208
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Environmental variables: Temperature
ranged from 17 ºC (January) to 30 ºC (October)
over the study period (Fig. 6A). The number
of daylight hours ranged between 10 and 13 h
per day, with the lowest values recorded from
November to January and the largest from May
to August (Fig. 6B). Gonad index values were
significantly correlated with temperature (rs =
0.68, P < 0.05) but not with photoperiod (rs =
0.17, P > 0.05). In contrast, gonad wet weight
Fig. 4. Gonad male stages of T. depressus from Bahía de La Paz, BCS, Mexico: A. Growing stage. B. Premature stage.
C. Mature stage. D. Spawning stage. E. Intergametic stage. NP: nutritive phagocytes. RS: residual spermatozoa. SC:
spermatocyte. SZ: spermatozoa. Scale bar = 100 µm.
209
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
was significantly correlated with photoperiod
(rs = 0.41, P > 0.05) but not with temperature
(rs = 0.76, P < 0.05).
Gonad wet weight and GI were the
only morphometric variables that showed
statistically significant (P < 0.05) differences
between some gonad stages; in particular,
values between the growing stage and the
premature, spawning, and intergametic stages
(Table 2).
Fig. 5. A. Reproductive cycle of Tripneustes depressus as shown by the monthly frequency of gonad stages. B. Gonad index.
C. Gonad wet weight. D. Adjusted gonad weight. Vertical bars are the standard errors.
210
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Fig. 6. Variation of environmental variables over the study period at Bahía de La Paz, BCS. A. In-situ temperature. B.
Daylight hours per day; vertical bars denote the monthly range of daylight hours, the dashed line marks the 12 h daylight
photoperiod that would be expected at the equator.
TABLE 1
Statistics (mean ± standard error, range in parentheses) of the morphometric variables recorded, per sex and for
the total sample for Tripneustes depressus in Bahía de la Paz, Mexico
Variable
Total
N = 1055
Females
N = 73
Males
N = 105
Kruskal-Wallis
H P
Total weight (g) 411.72 ± 4.25 (72-912) 425.04 ± 17.73 404.04 ± 14.56 2.20 0.138
Test diameter (cm) 9.79 ± 0.03 (5.0-12.3) 9.96 ± 0.10 9.82 ± 0.09 2.36 0.1245
Condition index (%) 44.38 ± 0.52 (8.79-150.88) 41.52 ± 1.24 41.33 ± 1.04 1.19 0.2745
Gonad wet weight (g) 28.65 ± 2.33 38.51 ± 1.85 11.78 0.0006*
Gonad index (%) 7.45 ± 0.61 10.66 ± 0.66 14.27 0.0002*
GLM
F P
Adjusted gonad weight (g) 27.53 ± 4.31 34.70 ± 3.96 39.97 0.0001*
*Variables with significant differences between females and males.
211
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
DISCUSSION
The specimens examined in our study
were adult, mostly intermediate-sized (9-11 cm
in diameter) individuals. Large specimens were
highly abundant in our sample, while small
individuals (< 5 cm) were absent. The absence
of juveniles may be due to various causes,
including predation, variability in the avail-
ability of food and refuge (Ebert, 1967; Sala &
Zabala, 1996), a different distribution than that
of adults (Fernandez, Caltagirone, & Johnson,
2001; Tomas, Romero, & Turon, 2004), or the
behavior of its growth rate (Sonnenholzner,
Touron, & Panchana-Orrala, 2018).
Mortality by predation in the early juve-
nile stages is considered the main bottleneck
in echinoid populations (Tegner & Dayton,
1981; McClanahan & Muthiga, 1989; Sala,
1997; López et al., 1998). In this sense, the
availability of refuge for juvenile sea urchins
is a key factor in the rate of predation (Roberts
& Ormond, 1987; Hixon & Beets, 1993), since
hiding and protection in crevices becomes
in the main strategy to avoid this predation.
In species like Echinometra mathaei, smaller
individuals are more susceptible to predation
than adults (Hart & Chia, 1990). Himmel-
man (1988), suggests that the juveniles of
Strongylocentrotus droebachiensis wait for ref-
uges until reaching a certain size, after which
they begin to move actively looking for food.
Botsford, Smith, and Quinn (1994) indicate
that the mortality rate increases when refuges
from predators are limited. In species such as
S. franciscanus and Echinometra vanbrunti,
when they reach a certain size, they are forced
to abandon their refuges, being more vulner-
able to predation (Tegner & Dayton, 1981;
González-Peláez, 2004). In this regard, also
has been reported that species such as S.
purpuratus and T. depressus show cannibal-
istic behaviors of medium-sized individuals
on small individuals in conditions of starving
or low food availability, which could directly
affect the presence of juveniles (Sonnenhol-
zner, Montaño-Moctezuma, & Searcy-Bernal,
2011; Sonnenholzner et al., 2018). However, in
our study area there is a great food availability.
The food availability of juvenile E. vanbrunti
TABLE 2
Means (± standard error) of the morphometric variables recorded, per sex and gonad stage.
Values with different letters are significantly different (P < 0.05)
Variable
Gonad stages Kruskal-Wallis
Growing Premature Mature Spawning Intergametic H P
Total weight, g
Female 399.14 ± 32.2 344.94 ± 81.5 551.70 ± 95.0 452.16 ± 39.9 450.57 ± 21.0 3.85 0.4269
Male 404.81 ± 24.0 365.63 ± 32.8 428.0* 439.43 ± 24.8 438.95 ± 18.2 4.41 0.2208
Test diameter, cm
Female 9.88 ± 0.2 9.56 ± 0.4 10.80 ± 0.7 9.90 ± 0.3 10.08 ± 0.1 3.38 0.4957
Male 9.98 ± 0.1 9.41 ± 0.2 10.3* 9.96 ± 0.3 9.95 ± 0.1 4.91 0.1776
Condition Index, %
Female 39.70 ± 2.6 35.62 ± 5.1 42.90 ± 0.3 45.83 ± 1.2 43.51 ± 1.3 1.74 0.7840
Male 39.80 ± 1.8 40.98 ± 2.4 39.2* 44.69 ± 2.0 44.05 ± 0.5 0.71 0.8712
Gonad wet weight, g
Female 38.51 ± 3.3c 29.53 ± 8.1bc 51.12 ± 14.5c 11.69 ± 4.4ab 20.74 ± 3.2a 24.28 0.0001
Male 46.22 ± 2.3b 29.60 ± 3.6a 15.0* 22.93 ± 3.8a 39.39 ± 4.2ab 20.15 0.0002
Gonad index (%)
Female 10.52 ± 0.8c 10.12 ± 2.8bc 9.00 ± 1.8bc 2.60 ± 0.8a 4.83 ± 0.7ab 33.14 0.0001
Male 13.25 ± 1.1b 9.22 ± 1.3a 3.5* 5.45 ± 1.1a 8.95 ± 0.9a 20.83 0.0001
* This stage was not included in the analyses because only one mature male was found.
212
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
in Panama can be another limiting factor, so
that spawning in populations occurs at the time
of upwelling (Lessios, 1981).
Juveniles and adults can also present dif-
ferent distribution. For P. lividus migrations
of small or medium-sized sea urchins have
been described (Haya de la Sierra, 1990; Fer-
nandez et al., 2001; Tomas et al., 2004), while
the adults are more sedentary and capable of
spending several months in confined spaces
(Dance, 1987). However, there are reports that
juvenile settlements in other species occur
where adults live (Cameron & Schroeter, 1980;
Tegner & Dayton, 1981).
Tropical species such as T. depressus,
large-size, short time to maturity, fast growth
rates, high reproductive effort, high respiration
rates, high feeding capacity and short life span
(Lawrence & Agatsuma, 2013), present a low
and highly variable survival rate of juveniles,
which may be an adaptation of their life strat-
egy (Stearns, 1976). In this sense, it has been
reported that the proliferation densities of T.
depressus in Ecuador can decrease rapidly or
disappear completely at monthly intervals, con-
trary to slow-growing temperate species (Son-
nenholzner et al., 2018), to which it contributes
in largely the absence of juveniles.
For all these reasons, the low recruitment
rate played a determining role in the distribu-
tion of the size structure found in T. depressus
in this study.
The average test diameter in the study
population was 9.79 ± 0.03 cm. This value is
similar to that reported for this same species
(9.74 ± 0.02 cm) at Punta Arenas de la Ventana,
Mexico (González-Peláez, 2001). In contrast,
larger average test diameters were reported in
two regions of the Galapagos Islands: 11.50
± 0.08 cm (Luna, 2000) and the largest of
12.50 cm reported by Sonnenholzner, Moreira,
and Panchana-Orrala (2019). The monthly fre-
quency of test diameter in T. depressus showed
a unimodal distribution, indicating that indi-
viduals could be of the same age, suggesting
that this species reproduces massively. In this
sense, Sonnenholzner et al. (2019) suggested
that T. depressus presents an initial natural
differentiation in the body size of small and
large individuals of the same cohort.
The average body wet weight of T. depres-
sus was 411.72 ± 4.25 g, higher than the figure
reported (347.6 ± 4.31 g) by González-Peláez
(2001) for the same species. Individual body
wet weight was highly variable and showed
no discernible pattern. This may be due to
various factors, including food availability,
coelomic fluid, and gonadal weight, therefore
these values have to be considered under this
information. In this study, the total body weight
was used for computing both the CI and the GI;
in addition, gonad wet weight was also used
for calculating the GI. Therefore, as discussed
below, the GI values are implicitly biased
given the dual nature of the gonad, and due to
the allometric relationship between the gonad
wet weight and the test diameter (Ebert et al.,
2011). Thus, we found that neither IC nor GI
are good indicators for the reproductive season
in T. depressus. GWW and AGW were both
better indicators of the reproductive status of
the population, since no significant differences
were found in the test length between months
or sex studied (note that this could be different
if the variation in the body size of the sample
studied is more extensive).
Sea urchin gonads, unlike those of other
organisms, also play a role as reserve organs
regardless of sex. Nutritive phagocytes, present
inside the gonad, store the nutrients necessary
for initiating gametogenesis and supply them to
germ cells (Walker, 1982; Walker et al., 2013;
Unuma 2002; Unuma et al., 2015). Gonad wet
weight is commonly used as an indicator of
reproductive status. However, due to their dual
role as nutrient reserve organs in sea urchins,
gonads may show high weight values even in
the intergametic stage due to the accumulation
of nutrients in storage cells (Kenner & Lares,
1991; Kelly, 2000; Unuma & Walker, 2009).
In T. depressus, GWW and AGW were signifi-
cantly higher in males in our study. This pattern
has also been reported for Abatus cavernosus
from the Argentinian Patagonia (Gil, Zaixso,
& Tolosano, 2009). However, the opposite
pattern (i.e., heavier gonads in females) has
213
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
been reported for many other species such
as S. droebachiensis (Meidel & Scheibling,
1999), Holopneustes purpurascens (William-
son & Steinberg, 2002), and Arbacia dufresnii
(Epherra et al., 2015).
The lightest gonads in male and female
T. depressus were found between January and
March (winter), and the heaviest from April to
September (spring-summer), although some
high values were also observed from October
to December. This trend was consistent with the
pattern shown by gonad stages. In this sense,
when gonads were heaviest, the frequency of
individuals in growing stage was high. Grow-
ing stage presented the highest proportion of
nutritive phagocytes. Additionally, in females
there was high gonad wet weight during grow-
ing and mature stages (no significant different
weights); this could not be appreciated in males
because only one mature male was found. In
this last female gonad stage, instead of nutritive
phagocytes, the highest proportion of gametes
provided the most weight. Therefore, gonad
wet weight illustrates the dual nature of this
organ in sea urchins. Once the reproductive
cycle was understood, the GWW and AGW
are useful to determine the reproductive season
(spawning period) in sea urchins due to its
timely development; i.e. spawning period is
characterized by lower GWW an AGW, result-
ing from weight loss associated with gamete
release, together with a low proportion of nutri-
tive phagocytes.
We observed that spawning peaked from
January to March (winter), with a smaller peak
in August. This finding differs from previous
studies on this same species. González-Peláez
(2001) reported a single spawning period from
May to August in Punta Arena, Bahía de La
Ventana, BCS, Mexico. For this same locality,
Álvarez-López (2017) reported that spawn-
ing occurred most of the year, except for
December, although he described two major
spawning seasons, one in October-November
and the other from April to June. Meanwhile,
the T. depressus population from the Gala-
pagos Islands (Ecuador) shows two or three
spawning periods per year. This is consistent
with the fact that sea urchin species inhabit-
ing in temperate zones exhibit a well-defined
reproductive cycle, whereas tropical species
show no apparent periodicity in spawning
(Luna, 2000). Sonnenholzner et al. (2018)
suggest that T. depressus has continuous, non-
discrete and synchronous gametogenic activity
throughout the year, with two peaks of gonadal
development for reproduction. This continuous
reproduction pattern with peaks in winter and
summer has been reported for other species of
the genus such as T. ventricosus off the coast
of Florida (McPherson, 1965) and T. gratilla in
Madagascar, Kenya and the Philippines (Muth-
iga, 2005; Toha et al., 2017).
Populations of the same species often
show differences in their spawning periods,
and significant interannual differences may
also occur within the same population (Pearse
& Cameron, 1991; Byrne, Andrew, Worthing-
ton, & Brett, 1998). The lack of a well-defined
spawning season seems to be common when
food is highly available and environmental
conditions are favorable (Kennedy & Pearse,
1975; Pearse, Pearse, & Davis, 1986; Bay-
Schmith & Pearse, 1987; Pearse & Cameron,
1991; Guillou & Michel, 1993). The partial
release of gametes (different spawning periods)
would ensure that at least part of the offspring
would coincide with favorable environmental
conditions (Calvo, Morriconi, & Orler, 1998).
Because of this characteristic, T. depressus
has been considered as an opportunistic spe-
cies that uses available resources to reproduce
(Lawrence & Agatsuma, 2013).
Gametic development is regulated by
endogenous factors such as the nutritional state
of the individual, which influences gonadal pro-
duction (Meidel & Scheibling, 1998; Walker &
Lesser, 1998; Garrido & Barber, 2001), as well
as by various environmental factors including
photoperiod, light intensity, and temperature
(Pearse et al., 1986; Bay-Schmith & Pearse,
1987; McClintock & Watts, 1990; Kelly, 2001;
Mercier & Hamel, 2009). Our results show
that gonad wet weight in T. depressus was
not correlated with temperature. Temperature
functions as a trigger of reproductive events
214
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
in many sea urchin species (James, Heath, &
Unwin, 2007). Many authors have reported that
high temperatures could boost gonad develop-
ment and maturation, and low temperatures,
the onset of gametogenesis (Espinoza, Reyes,
Himmelman, & Lodeiros, 2008; González-
Irusta, 2009). Lara-Rueda (2004) found a posi-
tive correlation between temperature and the
gonad cycle in E. vanbrunti. However, there
is also evidence showing that gonad growth
in P. lividus and S. droebachiensis is related to
decreasing temperatures (Herrero-Barrencua,
2008; James & Siikavuopio, 2012). Moreover,
in species such as S. purpuratus no direct cor-
relation was found between gonad cycle and
temperature (Cochran & Engelmann, 1975),
similar to our findings for T. depressus in this
study. Nevertheless, Gil (2015) concluded that,
although temperature is not the key driving fac-
tor for the onset of gametogenesis or spawning
in Pseudechinus magellanicus, it is essential
for oocytes to reach their maximum develop-
ment during the winter maturation.
Finally, the T. depressus gonad wet weight
was significantly correlated with photoperiod,
another factor known to influence the repro-
ductive cycle. We found that gonad develop-
ment (growing and premature stages) occurs
in the months with the longest daylight peri-
ods, whereas spawning takes place during the
season with the shortest daylight periods. Sea
urchins can detect light intensity through their
podia, which have innervated terminal discs
containing photosensitive pigments (Lesser,
Carleton, Böttger, Barry, & Walker, 2011).
Longer daylight periods have been found to
be associated with the onset of gametogenesis
in P. magellanicus and Evechinus chloroticus
(Brewin, Lamare, Keogh, & Mladenov, 2000;
Gil, 2015). However, experimental studies on
other species of sea urchins have shown that
gametogenesis is restrained in long days and
favored in short days (Pearse & Cameron,
1991). Direct lighting and changes in day length
are correlated with sea temperature in tropical
shallow-waters, and both factors can affect
sexual reproduction in marine invertebrates
(Coma, Ribes, Gili, & Zabala, 2000; Shpigel,
McBride, Marciano, & Lupatsch, 2004; Far-
hadian, Yusoff, & Arshad, 2014). This topic has
yet to be investigated in T. depressus.
Gonad wet weight and adjusted gonad
weight were found to be good indicators of the
reproductive season of T. depressus. The lowest
gonad wet weights were recorded in correspon-
dence with the shortest daylight and the spawn-
ing peak (January and March).
Ethical statement: authors declare that
they all agree with this publication and made
significant contributions; that there is no con-
flict of interest of any kind; and that we fol-
lowed all pertinent ethical and legal procedures
and requirements. All financial sources are
fully and clearly stated in the acknowledgments
section. A signed document has been filed in
the journal archives.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
This research was funded by Instituto
Politécnico Nacional (SIP projets 20170262,
20195021, 20200693). Ailet Vives received a
scholarship from Consejo Nacional de Ciencia
y Tecnología; the results here presented are part
of her thesis. Thanks to Sánchez-Salazar for the
English translation.
RESUMEN
Reproducción del erizo de mar Tripneustes depressus
(Camarodonta: Toxopneustidae) en Bahía de La Paz,
Baja California Sur, México
Introducción: Las gónadas de erizo de mar (huevas
o uni) se consideran un manjar culinario en todo el mundo.
Sin embargo, solo unas pocas especies se consideran
comestibles y se comercializan. El erizo de mar Tripneustes
depressus ha generado el interés de productores de Baja
California Sur, México, por la calidad de sus gónadas.
Una base biológica es clave para diseñar una estrategia de
manejo para T. depressus para considerar su explotación
comercial. Objetivo: Determinar la época reproductiva
de T. depressus a través de la descripción de los estadios
de las gónadas y del ciclo reproductivo, y establecer su
relación con factores ambientales. Métodos: Recolecta-
mos muestras mensuales (octubre de 2016 a septiembre de
2017), registrando in-situ la temperatura y el fotoperiodo.
Evaluamos una muestra de 1055 especímenes para las
215
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
características demográficas, utilizando el peso total (g)
y el diámetro de testa (cm). También hicimos el análisis
histológico de las gónadas de 178 individuos. Resultados:
El diámetro de la testa promedio fue de 9.70 ± 0.03 cm
(5-12.50 cm). Con base en la proporción en la gónada de
células sexuales (gametos) y somáticas (fagocitos nutriti-
vos), proponemos cinco estadios gonádicos (crecimiento,
prematuro, maduro, desove e intergamético) para ambos
sexos. Hubo dos épocas del año en que las gónadas eran
más pesadas y se correspondían estrechamente con la etapa
de crecimiento, coincidiendo con las proporciones más
altas de fagocitos nutritivos. El desarrollo de las gónadas
(etapas de crecimiento y prematuro) alcanza su punto
máximo en los meses con los periodos de luz más largos,
con desove en los periodos de luz más cortos. Conclusio-
nes: El peso húmedo de las gónadas y el peso ajustado de
las gónadas son buenos indicadores de la temporada repro-
ductiva de T. depressus. Los pesos húmedos más bajos de
las gónadas coincidieron con el pico de desove en el perío-
do con luz diurna más corto (enero y marzo).
Palabras clave: temporada reproductiva; pesos de gónadas
ajustados; estadios gonadales; hueva de erizo; Echinoidea.
REFERENCES
Álvarez-López, I.K. (2017). Ciclo reproductivo de Trip-
neustes depressus (Agassiz, 1863) (Echinodermata:
Echinoidea) en Punta Arena de la Ventana, Baja
California Sur, México (Bachelor thesis). Universi-
dad Autónoma de Baja California Sur, México.
Bay-Schmith, E., & Pearse, J.S. (1987). Effect of fixed
daylengths on the photoperiodic regulation of
gametogenesis in the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus
purpuratus. International Journal of Invertebrate
Reproduction and Development, 11(3), 287-294.
Botsford, L.W., Smith, B.D., & Quinn, J.F. (1994). Bimo-
dality in size distributions: the red sea urchin Stron-
gylocentrotus franciscanus as an example. Ecological
Applications, 4(1), 42-50.
Brewin, P.E., Lamare, M.D., Keogh, J.A., & Mladenov,
P.V. (2000). Reproductive variability over a four-
year period in the sea urchin Evechinus chloroticus
(Echinoidea: Echinodermata) from differing habitats
in New Zealand. Marine Biology, 137(3), 543-557.
Byrne, M., Andrew, N.L., Worthington, D.G., & Brett, P.A.
(1998). Reproduction in the diadematoid sea urchin
Centrostephanus rodgersii in contrasting habitats
along the coast of New South Wales, Australia. Mari-
ne Biology, 132(2), 305-318.
Calvo, J., Morriconi, E., & Orler, P.M (1998). Estrategias
reproductivas de moluscos bivalvos y equinoideos.
In E. Boschi (Ed.), El Mar Argentino y sus Recursos
Pesqueros (pp. 195-231). Argentina: INIDEP, Mar
del Plata.
Cameron, R.A., & Schroeter, S.C. (1980). Sea urchin
recruitment: effect of substrate selection on juvenile
distribution. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 2(3),
243-247.
Cochran, R.C., & Engelmann, F. (1975). Environmental
regulation of the annual reproductive season of Stron-
gylocentrotus purpuratus (Stimpson). The Biological
Bulletin, 148(3), 393-401.
Coma, R., Ribes, M., Gili, J.M., & Zabala, M. (2000).
Seasonality in coastal benthic ecosystems. Trends in
Ecology & Evolution, 15(11), 448-453.
Dance, C. (1987). Patterns of activity of the sea urchin
Paracentrotus lividus in the Bay of Port-Cros (Var,
France, Mediterranean). Marine Ecology, 8(2),
131-142.
Ebert, T.A. (1967). Negative growth and longevity in
the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
(Stimpson). Science, 157(3788), 557-558.
Ebert, T.A., Hernandez, J.C., & Russell, M.P. (2011).
Problems of the gonad index and what can be done:
analysis of the purple sea urchin Strongylocentrotus
purpuratus. Marine Biology, 158(1), 47-58.
Epherra, L., Gil, D.G., Rubilar, T., Pérez-Gallo, S., Reartes,
M.B., & Tolosano J.A. (2015). Temporal and spatial
differences in the reproductive biology of the sea
urchin Arbacia dufresnii. Marine and Freshwater
Research, 66, 329-342.
Espinoza, G., Reyes, J.L., Himmelman, J.H., & Lodeiros,
C. (2008). Echinometra lucunter (Echinodermata:
Echinoidea) en relación con factores ambientales en
el Golfo de Cariaco, Venezuela. Revista de Biología
Marina, 56, 341-350.
Farhadian, O., Yusoff, Md, & Arshad, A. (2014). Effects of
salinity, temperature, light intensity and light regimes
on production, growth and reproductive parameters
of Apocyclops dengizicus. Iranian Journal of Fishe-
ries Sciences, 13(1), 30-46.
Fernandez, C., & Pergent, G. (1998). Effect of different
formulated diets and rearing conditions on growth
parameters in the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus.
Journal of Shellfish Research, 17, 1571-1581.
Fernandez, C., Caltagirone, A., & Johnson, M. (2001).
Demographic structure suggests migration of the
sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Echinodermata:
Echinoidea) in a coastal lagoon. Journal of Marine
Biology Association of U.K., 81, 361-362.
Garrido, C.L., & Barber, B.J. (2001). Effects of tempera-
ture and food ration on gonad growth and oogenesis
of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus droeba-
chiensis. Marine Biology, 138(3), 447-456.
Gil, D.G., Zaixso, H.E., & Tolosano, J.A. (2009). Brooding
of the sub-Antarctic heart urchin, Abatus cavernosus
216
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
(Spatangoida: Schizasteridae), in southern Patagonia.
Marine Biology, 156, 1647-1657.
Gil, D.G. (2015). Biología y ecología del erizo de mar
Pseudechinus magellanicus (Echinoidea: Temnopleu-
ridae) en Patagonia Central (Doctoral thesis). Uni-
versidad Nacional de La Plata, Argentina.
González-Irusta, J.M. (2009). Contribución al conocimien-
to del erizo de mar Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck,
1816) en el Mar Cantábrico: ciclo gonadal y dinámi-
ca de poblaciones. (Doctoral thesis). Universidad de
Cantabria, España.
González-Peláez, S.S. (2001). Biología poblacional del
erizo café Tripneustes depressus A. Agassiz, 1863
(Echinodermata: Echinoidea), en el sur del Golfo de
California, México (Licenciature thesis). Universidad
Autónoma de Baja California Sur, México.
González-Peláez, S.S. (2004). Biología poblacional del
erizo Echinometra vanbrunti (Echinodermata; Echi-
noidea), en el Sur del Golfo de California, México
(Master´s thesis). Centro De Investigaciones Biológi-
cas del Noroeste, México.
Guillou, M., & Michel, C. (1993). Reproduction and
growth of Sphaerechinus granularis (Echinoderma-
ta: Echinoidea) in Southern Brittany. Journal of the
Marine Biological Association of the United King-
dom, 73(1), 179-192.
Harrold, C., & Pearse, J.S. (1987). The ecological role of
echinoderms in kelp forests. In H.M. Jangoux & J.M.
Lawrence (Eds.), Echinoderm studies (pp. 137-233).
Rotterdam: Balkema Press.
Hart, L.J., & Chia, F.S. (1990). Effect of food supply and
body size on the foraging behavior of the burrowing
sea urchin Echinometra mathaei (de Blainville).
Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecolo-
gy, 135(2), 99-108.
Haya de la Sierra, D. (1989). Biología y ecología de Para-
centrotus lividus en la zona intermareal. (Doctoral
thesis). Universidad de Oviedo, España.
Herrero-Barrencua, A. (2008). Aspectos reproductivos del
erizo común Paracentrotus lividus en aguas del Este
de Gran Canaria (Bachelor thesis). Universidad de
Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, España.
Himmelman, J.H. (1986). Population biology of green sea
urchins on rocky barrens. Marine Ecology Progress
Series, 33, 295-306.
Hixon, M.A., & Beets, J.P. (1993). Predation, prey refuges,
and the structure of coral-reef fish assemblages. Eco-
logical Monographs, 63(1), 77-101.
Humason, G.L. (1979). Animal tissue techniques. San
Francisco: W.H. Freeman and Company.
James, P., & Siikavuopio, S.I. (2012). A guide to the sea
urchin reproductive cycle and staging sea urchin
gonad samples. Norway: Nofima.
James, P.J., Heath, P., & Unwin, M.J. (2007). The effects
of season, temperature and initial gonad condition on
roe enhancement of the sea urchin Evechinus chloro-
ticus. Aquaculture, 270, 115-131.
Kelly, M.S. (2000). The reproductive cycle of the sea
urchin Psammechinus miliaris (Echinodermata: Echi-
noidea) in a Scottish sea loch. Journal of the Marine
Biological Association of the United Kingdom, 80(5),
909-919.
Kelly, M.S. (2001). Environmental parameters controlling
gametogenesis in the echinoid Psammechinus milia-
ris. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and
Ecology, 266(1), 67-80.
Kennedy, B., & Pearse, J.S. (1975). Lunar synchroniza-
tion of the monthly reproductive rhythm in the sea
urchin Centrostephanus coronatus Verrill. Journal
of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 17(3),
323-331.
Kenner, M.C., & Lares, M.T. (1991). Size at first reproduc-
tion of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus
in a central California kelp forest. Marine Ecology
Progress Series Oldendorf, 76(3), 303-306.
Lara-Rueda, G.N. (2004). Ciclo reproductivo del erizo de
mar Echinometra vanbrunti (Agassiz 1863, Echino-
dermata, Echinoidea) en Ensenada de Muertos Baja
California Sur México (Bachelor thesis). Universidad
Autónoma de Baja California Sur, México.
Lawrence, J.M. (2007). The edible sea urchin. In J.M.
Lawrence (Ed.), Edible sea urchins: Biology and
Ecology. Netherlands: Elsevier Science.
Lawrence, J.M., & Agatsuma, Y. (2013). Tripneustes. In
J.M. Lawrence (Ed.), Sea urchins: Biology and Eco-
logy (Vol. 38, pp. 491-507). Elsevier.
Lesser, M.P., Carleton, K.L., Böttger, S.A., Barry, T.M.,
& Walker, C.W. (2011). Sea urchin tube feet are
photosensory organs that express a rhabdomeric-like
opsin and PAX6. Proceedings of the Royal Society B:
Biological Sciences, 278, 3371-3379.
Lessios, H.A. (1981). Reproductive periodicity of the echi-
noids Diadema and Echinometra on the two coasts
of Panama. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology
and Ecology, 50(1), 47-61.
López, S., Turon, X., Montero, E., Palacín, C., Duarte,
C.M., & Tarjuelo, I. (1998). Larval abundance,
recruitment and early mortality in Paracentrotus livi-
dus (Echinoidea). Interannual variability and plank-
ton-benthos coupling. Marine Ecology Progress
Series, 172, 239-251.
217
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075, Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Luna, S. (2000). Distribución poblacional y ciclo reproduc-
tivo del erizo de mar blanco Tripneustes depressus
(Echinodermata: Echinoidea) en las Islas Galápagos
(Bachelor thesis). Universidad San Francisco de
Quito, Ecuador.
McBride, S.C., Pinnix, W.D., Lawrence, J.M., Lawren-
ce, A.L., & Mulligan, T.M. (1997). The effect of
temperature on production of gonads by the sea
urchin Strongylocentrotus franciscanus fed natural
and prepared diets. Journal of the World Aquaculture
Society, 28(4), 357-365.
McClanahan, T.R., & Muthiga, N.A. (1989). Patterns of
predation on a sea urchin, Echinometra mathaei (de
Blainville), on Kenyan coral reefs. Journal of Expe-
rimental Marine Biology and Ecology, 126(1), 77-94.
McClintock, J.B., & Watts, S.A. (1990). The effects of
photoperiod on gametogenesis in the tropical sea
urchin Eucidaris tribuloides (Lamarck) (Echinoder-
mata: Echinoidea). Journal of Experimental Marine
Biology and Ecology, 139(3), 175-184.
McPherson, B.F. (1965). Contributions to the biology of
the sea urchin Tripneustes ventricosus. Bulletin of
Marine Science, 15(1), 228-244.
Meidel, S.K., & Scheibling, R.E. (1998). Annual reproduc-
tive cycle of the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus
droebachiensis, in differing habitats in Nova Scotia,
Canada. Marine Biology, 131(3), 461-478.
Meidel, S.K., & Scheibling, R.E. (1999). Effects of food
type and ration on reproductive maturation and
growth of the sea urchin Strongylocentrotus droeba-
chiensis. Marine Biology, 134(1), 155-166.
Mercier, A. & Hamel, J.F. (2009). Endogenous and exo-
genous control of gametogenesis and spawning in
echinoderms. Londres: Academic Press.
Montealegre, S.Q., & Gómez, A.G. (2005). Ciclo reproduc-
tivo de Lytechinus variegatus (Echinoidea: Toxop-
neustidae) en el sur de Isla Margarita, Venezuela.
Revista de Biología Tropical, 53, 305-312.
Muthiga, N.A. (2005). Testing for the effects of seasonal
and lunar periodicity on the reproduction of the edible
sea urchin Tripneustes gratilla (L) in Kenyan coral
reef lagoons. Hydrobiologia, 549(1), 57-64.
Packard, G.C., & Boardman, T.J. (1999). The use of
percentages and size specific indices to normalize
physiological data for variation in body size: wasted
time, wasted effort?. Comparative Biochemistry and
Physiology Part A, 122, 37-44.
Pearse, J.S., Pearse, V.B., & Davis, K.K. (1986). Photope-
riodic regulation of gametogenesis and growth in the
sea urchin Strongylocentrotus purpuratus. Journal of
Experimental Zoology, 237(1), 107-118.
Pearse, J.S., & Cameron, R.A. (1991). Reproduction
of marine invertebrates. In A.C. Giese, J.S. Pear-
se, & V.B. Pearse (Eds.), Echinodermata: Echinoi-
dea. Echinoderms and Lophophorates (Vol 6, pp.
514-662). California: The Boxwood Press, Pacific
Groove.
Ridder, J., & Lawrence, M. (1982). Food and feeding
mechanisms: Echinoidea. In M. Jangoux & J.M.
Lawrence (Eds.), Echinoderm nutrition (pp. 331-
372). Rotterdam, Netherland: Balkema.
Roberts, C.M & Ormond, R.F.G. (1987). Habitat com-
plexity and coral reef fish diversity and abundance
on red sea fringing reefs. Marine Ecology Progress
Series, 41, 1-8.
Sala, E. (1997). Fish predators and scavengers of the sea
urchin Paracentrotus lividus in protected areas of
the north-west Mediterranean Sea. Marine Biology,
129(3), 531-539.
Sala, E., & Zabala, M. (1996). Fish predation and the
structure of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus
populations in the NW Mediterranean. Marine Eco-
logy Progress Series, 140, 71-81.
Sánchez-España, A., Martínez-Pita, I., & García, F.J.
(2004). Gonadal growth and reproduction in the com-
mercial sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus (Lamarck,
1816) (Echinodermata: Echinoidea) from southern
Spain. Hydrobiologia, 519(1-3), 61-72.
Shpigel, M., McBride, S.C., Marciano, S., & Lupatsch, I.
(2004). The effect of photoperiod and temperature on
the reproduction of European sea urchin Paracentro-
tus lividus. Aquaculture, 232(1-4), 343-355.
Sokal, R.R., & Rohlf, F.J. (1979). Biometría: Principios y
métodos estadísticos en la investigación biológica.
Madrid: H. Blume.
Sonnenholzner, J.I., Montaño-Moctezuma, G., & Searcy-
Bernal, R. (2011). Effect of macrophyte diet and initial
size on the survival and somatic growth of sub-adult
Strogylocentrotus purpuratus: a laboratory experi-
mental approach. Journal of Applied Phycology, 23,
505-513.
Sonnenholzner, J.I., Touron, N., & Panchana-
Orrala, M.M. (2018). Breeding, larval deve-
lopment, and growth of juveniles of the
edible sea urchin Tripneustes depressus: a new
target species for aquaculture in Ecuador. Aquacultu-
re, 496, 134-145.
Sonnenholzner, J.I., Moreira, J.A., & Panchana-Orrala,
M.M. (2019). Growth performance and survival of
Holothuria theeli (holothurian) fed with feces of Trip-
neustes depressus (echinoid): A multi-trophic aqua-
culture approach. Aquaculture, 512, Article number
734345.
218
Revista de Biología Tropical, ISSN electrónico: 2215-2075 Vol. 69(S1): 202-218, March 2021 (Published Mar. 30, 2021)
Spirlet, C., Grosjean, P., & Jangoux, M. (2000). Optimiza-
tion of gonad growth by manipulation of temperature
and photoperiod in cultivated sea urchins, Paracen-
trotus lividus (Lamarck) (Echinodermata). Aquacul-
ture, 185(1-2), 85-99.
Stearns, S.C. (1976). Life-history tactics: a review of the
ideas. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 51(1), 3-47.
Tegner, M.J., & Dayton, P.K. (1981). Population struc-
ture, recruitment and mortality of two sea urchins
(Strongylocentrotus franciscanus and S. purpuratus)
in a kelp forest. Marine Ecology Progress Series, 5,
255-268.
Timeanddate. (2017). Retrieved 18 October 2017, from
https://www.timeanddate.com/sun.
Toha, A.H.A., Sumitro, S.B., Hakim, L., Widodo, N.,
Binur, R., Suhaemi, S., & Anggoro, A.W. (2017).
Biology of the commercially used sea urchin Trip-
neustes gratilla (Linnaeus, 1758) (Echinoidea: Echi-
nodermata). Ocean Life, 1(1), 1-10.
Tomas, F., Romero, J., & Turon, X. (2004). Settlement and
recruitment of the sea urchin Paracentrotus lividus in
two contrasting habitats in the Mediterranean. Marine
Ecology Progress Series, 282, 173-184.
Toro-Farmer, G., Cantera, J.R., Londono-Cruz, E., Orozco,
C., & Neira, R. (2004). Patrones de distribución y
tasas de bioerosión del erizo Centrostephanus coro-
natus (Diadematoida: Diadematidae), en el arrecife
de Playa Blanca, Pacífico colombiano. Revista de
Biología Tropical, 52(1), 67-76.
Unuma, T. (2002). Gonadal growth and its relationship to
aquaculture in sea urchins. In Y. Yokota, V. Matranga,
& Z. Smolenicka (Eds.), The Sea Urchin: From Basic
Biology to Aquaculture (pp. 115-127). Lisse: Swets
& Zeitlinger.
Unuma, T., & Walker, C.W. (2009). Relationship between
gametogenesis and food quality in sea urchin gonads.
In R. Stickney, R. Iwamoto, & M. Rust (Eds.), Aqua-
culture Technologies for Invertebrates: Proceedings
of the 36th US-Japan Aquaculture Panel Symposium
(pp. 45-53). Durham, New Hampshire and Milford,
Connecticut: NOAA Technical Memoires.
Unuma, T., Murata, Y., Hasegawa, N., Sawaguchi, S., &
Takahashi, K. (2015). Improving the food quality
of sea urchins collected from barren grounds by
short-term aquaculture under controlled temperature.
Bulletin of Fisheries Research Agency, 40, 145-153.
Vaitilingon, D., Rasolofonirina, R., & Jangoux, M. (2005).
Reproductive Cycle of Edible Echinoderms Tripneus-
tes gratilla (Echinoidea, Echinodermatata) from the
Southwestern lndian Ocean. Western Indian Ocean
Journal of Marine Science, 4(1), 47-60.
Vives, A. (2018). Calidad de la gónada del erizo de mar
Tripneustes depressus (Agassiz, 1863) (Echinoder-
mata: Echinoidea) en la Bahía de La Paz, Baja
California Sur, México (Masters thesis). Instituto
Politécnico Nacional, México.
Walker, C.W. (1982). Nutrition of gametes. In M. Jangoux
& J. Lawrence (Eds.), Nutrition of Echinoderms (pp.
449-468). Rotterdam: Balkema.
Walker, C.W., & Lesser, M.P. (1998). Manipulation of
food and photoperiod promotes out-of-season game-
togenesis in the green sea urchin, Strongylocentrotus
droebachiensis: implications for aquaculture. Marine
Biology, 132(4), 663-676.
Walker, C.W., Unuma, T., & Lesser, M.P. (2007). Game-
togenesis and reproduction of sea urchins. In J.M.
Lawrence (Ed.), Developments in Aquaculture and
Fisheries Science (Vol. 37, pp. 11-33). Amsterdam:
Elsevier.
Walker, C.W., Lesser, M.P., & Unuma, T. (2013). Sea
urchin gametogenesis–structural, functional and
molecular/genomic biology. In J.M. Lawrence (Ed.),
Sea urchins: Biology and Ecology, (Vol. 38, pp.
25-43). Amsterdam, Netherlands: Elsevier.
Williamson, J., & Steinberg, P. (2002). Reproductive
cycle of the sea urchin Holopneustes purpurascens
(Temnopleuridae: Echinodermata). Marine Biology,
140(3), 519-532.