Supplementary Files
Keywords
TRAINING
TRAINING CENTER
UNIVERSITIES
ESTRATEGIAS DE DESARROLLO
FORMACIÓN
CENTRO DE ENTRENAMIENTO
UNIVERSIDADES
How to Cite
Abstract
The purpose of this article is to scientifically study the activity and scope of the Small Business Development Centers (SBDC) through a systematic review of the literature. For this purpose, a Boolean search is carried out and the information is extracted from three databases: Scopus, SSCI and EBSCOhost. The specific objectives are: to identify the different theoretical perspectives that characterize and define the literature related to SBDCs and to highlight the connections between them; determine the perspective to which researchers have given the greatest importance according to a trend analysis of publications; identify the greatest exponents of the subject and identify the sources that are most consulted. To obtain the bibliometric information, citation techniques were used to select, analyze and interpret the patterns within the literature. It is achieved: identifying business development and entrepreneurship education as the two main theoretical perspectives; business education is established as the most important perspective given its growth; the greatest exponents and sources that publish the subject are recognized. From a practical aspect, this research contributes to the analysis of the existing theory on SBDC and shows their effectiveness.
References
Bosma, N., & Kelley, D. (2019). Global Entrepreneurship Monitor 2018-19 (Vol. 8). https://www.gemconsortium.org/report/gem-2018-2019-global-report
Boyle, F., & Sherman, D. (2006). “ScopusTM: The Product and Its Development.” The Serials Librarian, 49(3): 147–53. https://doi.org/10.1300/J123v49n03_12
Chrisman, J. J. (1989). Strategic, administrative, and operating assistance: The value of outside consulting to pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 4(6), 401–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(89)90010-4
Chrisman, J. J., Carsrud, A. L., DeCastro, J., & Herron, L. (1990). A comparison of assistance needs of male and female pre-venture entrepreneurs. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(4), 235–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(90)90019-P
Chrisman J. J., Chua J. H., & Kellermanns, F. (2009). Priorities, resource stocks, and performance in family and nonfamily firms. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 33(3), 739–760. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00324.x
Chrisman, J. J., Hoy, F., & Robinson, R. B. (1987). New venture development: The costs and benefits of public sector assistance. Journal of Business Venturing, 2(4), 315–328. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(87)90024-3
Chrisman, J. J., & Katrishen, F. (1994). The economic impact of small business development center counseling activities in the United States: 1990-1991. Journal of Business Venturing, 9(4), 271–280. https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90008-6
Chrisman, J. J., & Katrishen, F. (1995). The small business development center programme in the USA: A statistical analysis of its impact on economic development. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 7(2), 143–155. https://doi.org/10.1080/08985629500000009
Chrisman, J. J., McMullan, W. E., Kirk Ring, J., & Holt, D. T. (2012). Counseling assistance, entrepreneurship education, and new venture performance. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Public Policy, 1(1), 63–83. https://doi.org/10.1108/20452101211208362
Dill, D. D. (1995). University-industry entrepreneurship: The organization and management of American university technology transfer units. Higher Education, 29(4), 369–384. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01383958
Dini, M. (2019). Centros de desarrollo empresarial en América Latina: Lecciones de política de cinco experiencias institucionales. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/44589
Dini, M., & Stumpo, G. (2018). Mipymes en América Latina. Un frágil desempeño y nuevos desafíos para las políticas de fomento. CEPAL. https://repositorio.cepal.org/handle/11362/44148.1
Hernández-Sánchez, B., Vargas-Morúa, G., González Cedeño, G., & Sánchez-García, J. C. (2020). Discapacidad intelectual y el uso de las tecnologías de la información y comunicación: revisión sistemática. International Journal of Developmental and Educational Psychology INFAD, 2(1), 177–188. https://doi.org/10.17060/ijodaep.2020.n1.v2.1830
Liberati, A., Altman, D. G., Tetzlaff, J., Mulrow, C., Gøtzsche, P. C., Ioannidis, J. P. A., Clarke, M. Devereaux, P. J., Kleijnen, J., & Moher, D. (2009). The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 62(10), E1-E34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2009.06.006
McInturff, P., & Tapie Rohm, C. E.. (2002). Developing M-education for entrepreneurs and small businesses. Journal of Internet Commerce, 1(3), 49–65. https://doi.org/10.1300/J179v01n03_05
Medaris, L., & Manley, M. (1997). Building a better mousetrap: Networking with community business resources. The Reference Librarian, 27(58), 41–48. https://doi.org/10.1300/J120v27n58_05
Medeiros, V., Godoi, L. G., & Teixeira, E. C. (2019). La competitividad y sus factores determinantes: Un análisis sistémico para países en desarrollo. Revista de la CEPAL, 2019(129), 7–27. https://doi.org/10.18356/9c2a7060-es
Oprea, D., & Bernier, R. E. (2004). Sustaining free market economic education in a transition economy: A romanian experience. International Journal of Public Administration, 27(11–12), 917–929. https://doi.org/10.1081/PAD-200037368
Phillips, R. L. (2014). An Analysis of Small Business Assistance Websites: Content and Delivery. Journal of Business and Finance Librarianship, 19(2), 125–141. https://doi.org/10.1080/08963568.2014.883880
Politis, J. L., & Shooter, S. B. (2001). Enhancing Engineering Education: The Bucknell Product Development Center. Industry and Higher Education, 15(5), 341–347. https://doi.org/10.5367/000000001101295876
Roebuck, D. B., & Brawley, D. E. (1996). Forging Links Between the Academic and Business Communities. Journal of Education for Business, 71(3), 125–128. https://doi.org/10.1080/08832323.1996.10116771
Roundy, P. T. (2017). Hybrid organizations and the logics of entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 13(4), 1221–1237. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-017-0452-9
Sánchez-García, J., Vargas-Morúa, G., & Hernández-Sánchez, B. (2018). Entrepreneurs’ Well-Being: A Bibliometric Review. Frontiers in Psychology, 9(September), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01696
Sarmiento, J. P., Hoberman, G., Jerath, M., & Ferreira Jordao, G. (2016). Disaster risk management and business education: the case of small and medium enterprises. AD-Minister, 28, 73–90. https://doi.org/10.17230/ad-minister.28.4
Steinnes, D. N. (1987). On Understanding and Evaluating the University’s Evolving Economic Development Policy. Economic Development Quarterly, 1(3), 214–225. https://doi.org/10.1177/089124248700100304
Udell, G. G. (1988). Strategies for stimulating home-grown technology-based economic development. Business Horizons, 31(6), 60–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(88)90026-2
Urrútia, G., & Bonfill, X. (2010). Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Medicina Clinica, 135(11), 507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015
van Eck, N. J., & Waltman, L. (2010). Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, 84(2), 523–538. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-009-0146-3
Venkataraman, S. (2004). Regional transformation through technological entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing, 19(1), 153–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2003.04.001
Waltman, L., van Eck, N. J., & Noyons, E. C. M. (2010). A unified approach to mapping and clustering of bibliometric networks. Journal of Informetrics, 4(4), 629–635. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joi.2010.07.002
Werbel, J. D., & Danes, S. M. (2010). Work family conflict in new business ventures: The moderating effects of spousal commitment to the new business venture. Journal of Small Business Management, 48(3), 421–440. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00301.x